Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31094House OversightFinancial Record

Email discusses editors paying witnesses and criminals for stories, citing PCC code and suggesting potential unethical payments

The passage hints at possible illicit payments by media editors to witnesses or criminals for information, referencing legal guidelines. It provides a specific email chain with names (Ross, Kevin Maxw Email alleges editors can pay criminals or witnesses for stories, possibly breaching Contempt of Cou Mentions specific individuals (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) involved in the

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030229
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage hints at possible illicit payments by media editors to witnesses or criminals for information, referencing legal guidelines. It provides a specific email chain with names (Ross, Kevin Maxw Email alleges editors can pay criminals or witnesses for stories, possibly breaching Contempt of Cou Mentions specific individuals (Ross, Kevin Maxwell, Gareth Thompson, Brian Basham) involved in the

Tags

media-influencemedia-ethicsfinancial-flowcriminal-justicewitness-paymentslegal-compliancelegal-exposurehouse-oversightjournalistic-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Date: Saturday, March 12 2011 02:15 AM Subject: Fw: Daily Mail From: Gmax To: jeevacation@gmail.com; -—— Original Message ----- From: Ross ¢0w a - To: C2 <i >; Ross Gow ~ 'a Jan Ian Maxwell iii .. Kevin Maxwell —_—* Gareth Thompson <j Bn eeeeeer—C—“CtiCSS Cc: Brian Basham {ii i_ i Sent: Thu Mar 10 16:29:24 2011 Subject: Re: Daily Mail Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest. Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective. Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted. 15 Witness payments in criminal trials 1) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981. This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea, the court has announced its verdict. *i1) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought demonstrably to be published in the public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the outcome of atrial. *ii1) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to the prosecution and

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.