Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31125House OversightOther

Iranian religious leaders' historical sexual pronouncements cited in commentary

The passage is a broad, opinion‑style analysis of Iranian clerical attitudes toward sexuality, citing historical religious texts without any specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable le Mentions Ayatollah Khomeini's 1961 treatise on sexual matters. Describes a general claim that Iranian fundamentalists focus heavily on sexuality. Frames sexual issues as politically relevant in Iran'

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026553
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a broad, opinion‑style analysis of Iranian clerical attitudes toward sexuality, citing historical religious texts without any specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable le Mentions Ayatollah Khomeini's 1961 treatise on sexual matters. Describes a general claim that Iranian fundamentalists focus heavily on sexuality. Frames sexual issues as politically relevant in Iran'

Tags

sexualityhistorical-textsirantheocracyreligionhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Perhaps it's not entirely surprising that Iran's Shiite fundamentalists -- not unlike their evangelical Christian, Catholic, Orthodox Jewish, and Sunni Muslim counterparts -- spend an inordinate amount of time pondering sexuality. They are human, after all. But the sexual manias of Iran's religious fundamentalists are worthy of greater scrutiny, all the more so because they control a state with nuclear ambitions, vast oil wealth, and a young, dynamic, stifled population. Yet for a variety of reasons -- fear of becoming Salman Rushdie, of being labeled an Orientalist, of upsetting religious sensibilities -- the remarkable hypocrisy of the Iranian regime is often studiously avoided. That's a mistake. Because religion is politics in a theocracy like Iran, uninformed or antiquated notions of sexuality aren't just confined to the bedroom -- they pervade the country's seminaries, military barracks, boardrooms, courtrooms, and classrooms. A common aphorism among Iranians is that before the revolution, people partied outside the home and prayed inside, while today they pray outside and party inside. This reverse dichotomy is true of a lot of social behavior in Iran. For many Iranians, this perverse state of affairs is now so ingrained, such an inherent aspect of daily interactions with Iranian officialdom, that it is no longer noteworthy. For those in the West who seek to better understand what makes Tehran tick, though, the regime's curious fixation on sex cannot be ignored. To paraphrase the late U.S. House Speaker Tip O'Neill, in the Islamic Republic of Iran all politics may not be sexual, but all sex is political. Exhibit A is the revolution's father, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Like all Shiite clerics aspiring to become a "source of emulation" (marja'’-e taglid), Khomeini spent the first part of his career meticulously examining and dispensing religious guidance on personal behavior and ritual purity that ranged from the mundane ("It is reeommended not to hold back the need to urinate or defecate, especially if it hurts") to the surprisingly lewd. In his 1961 religious treatise A Clarification of Questions (Towzih al-Masael), Khomeini issued detailed pronouncements on issues ranging from sodomy ("If a man sodomizes the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid") to bestiality ("If a person has intercourse with a cow, a sheep, or a camel, their urine and

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.