Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31266House OversightDeposition

Court filing argues against labeling [REDACTED - Survivor] as a prostitute and discusses PTSD expert testimony

The passage provides routine litigation arguments about reputational language and expert testimony in a civil case involving [REDACTED - Survivor] and a Maxwell associate. It mentions no new financial flow Defense objects to using derogatory terms for plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor]. Claims plaintiff’s PTSD is unrelated to the defendant’s actions. Cites an exhibit showing internet descriptions of Giuffre as

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011355
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides routine litigation arguments about reputational language and expert testimony in a civil case involving [REDACTED - Survivor] and a Maxwell associate. It mentions no new financial flow Defense objects to using derogatory terms for plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor]. Claims plaintiff’s PTSD is unrelated to the defendant’s actions. Cites an exhibit showing internet descriptions of Giuffre as

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

litigationdefamationcivil-procedurelegal-exposurehouse-oversightreputational-riskexpert-testimony

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 52 H3VOGIU1 claiming she has damages of post-traumatic stress disorder, and she is the one who is going to call to the stand her psychiatrist to talk about that patient, and she is the one that gave him evidence about these other acts to him and on which he has relied in reaching his conclusions. It is impossible for us to not be able to cross examine her expert about preexisting PTSD caused by incidents and events unrelated to Ms. Maxwell. Motion in limine number 7, whether or not Ms. Giuffre can be called a prostitute. Your Honor, no one in this case, no counsel, nobody that I'm aware of involved with the litigation has referred to [REDACTED] as a slut. That is something that plaintiff's counsel has brought up, and you will notice there is absolutely no cite in any record, in any document referring to her as such. What has come up, your Honor, are internet sites in which Ms. Giuffre has been called all kinds of things that are unrelated to Ms. Maxwell, that do not cite Ms. Maxwell. For xample, her friends gave interviews to the press in which they described -- and this is attached as my Exhibit L -- described [REDACTED] as "a money hungry sex kitten who enjoyed her 23 24 25 lavish lifestyle". We cannot talk about plaintiff's reputation on the internet without talking about what is out there on the internet. We cannot cross examine her or cross examine her experts about what her reputation is if we can't ask about SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300
Wire Refreferring

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.