Court transcript excerpt discussing admissibility of sexual assault and drug evidence

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 wae) H3VOGIU1 in the way that we did. I'm just going to let my counsel address any final issues. MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, I don't have anything further to say on motion in limine number 6. The defendant has not given any valid reason or justification for introducing any evidence of prior sexual assault that should be excluded for all the reasons in the brief and the oral argument over thes two days. With regard to drugs, there are voluminous medical records presented here. Defendant's counsel has stood up and said there are false statements to doctors and have suggested that Ms. Giuffre is doctor shopping. I'll submit that the records do net reflect that. Defendant apparently seeks to introduce a jotted down note here or there from medical records, but these are plainly hearsay, and a sentence fragment in the middle of a medical chart is not admissible evidence, it's hearsay. And then, they're certainly not a party admission, they don't even reflect the totality of what the conversation is between patient and doctor. Also, I would also submit that the prescription records show that they are not doctor shopping to a mass amounts of pills or medication. The prescription records speak for themselves. You can count the number of pills that were SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382