Jane Doe #3 alleges Jeffrey Epstein forced her to have sex with numerous powerful figures, including Prince Andrew and unnamed foreign leaders
The filing provides a concrete allegation linking Jeffrey Epstein to a network of high‑level political and business figures, including a named royal (Prince Andrew). While the claim is unverified and Jane Doe #3 claims Epstein forced her into sexual acts with "many other powerful men" Alleged participants include "numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, Prince Andre
Summary
The filing provides a concrete allegation linking Jeffrey Epstein to a network of high‑level political and business figures, including a named royal (Prince Andrew). While the claim is unverified and Jane Doe #3 claims Epstein forced her into sexual acts with "many other powerful men" Alleged participants include "numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, Prince Andre
Persons Referenced (2)
“...utives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders.” The filing names Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, as one of those world leaders. The Florida Center for Investigative Reporting i...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...beyond our legal pleading,” Cassel said. Inthe most recent court filing, Jane Doe #3 alleges that Epstein forced her to have sex with “many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politic...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
1200
1441http://www.thelslawfirm.comRelated Documents (6)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Case 09-34791-RBR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-Civ-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER COME NOW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this response in opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order (DE 247). Epstein's motion is a thinly-disguised attempt to relitigate issues already covered by the court's earlier ruling eleven months ago (DE 188), which allowed the victims to file correspondence relating to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement in the public court file. Rather than reverse its previous ruling, this Court should reaffirm it — and allow the important issues presented by this case to be litigated in the light of day. BACKGROUND Because of Epstein's penchant for relitigating issues that have already been decided, it
EFTA01689427
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.