Attorney recounts 1986 Supreme Court oral argument on Arizona death‑penalty case involving the Tison brothers
The passage provides a personal recollection of a historic Supreme Court hearing, mentioning Justices White and Scalia, but offers no new factual leads, allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or The argument was made on November 3, 1986, concerning the Tison brothers' death‑penalty appeal. The attorney argued that the state conceded the brothers lacked specific intent to kill. Justice White
Summary
The passage provides a personal recollection of a historic Supreme Court hearing, mentioning Justices White and Scalia, but offers no new factual leads, allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or The argument was made on November 3, 1986, concerning the Tison brothers' death‑penalty appeal. The attorney argued that the state conceded the brothers lacked specific intent to kill. Justice White
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.