Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31801House OversightOther

Document alleges Jeffrey Epstein used lawsuits to silence victims and accuses attorney James Patterson of malicious prosecution

The passage repeats known accusations against Epstein and mentions a civil dispute between an unnamed attorney (James Patterson) and a lawyer named Edwards, but provides no concrete dates, transaction Claims Epstein filed a baseless lawsuit to avoid accountability for sexual abuse. Attorney James Patterson describes the lawsuit as a desperate measure by Epstein. Edwards filed a counter‑claim for m

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022177
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats known accusations against Epstein and mentions a civil dispute between an unnamed attorney (James Patterson) and a lawyer named Edwards, but provides no concrete dates, transaction Claims Epstein filed a baseless lawsuit to avoid accountability for sexual abuse. Attorney James Patterson describes the lawsuit as a desperate measure by Epstein. Edwards filed a counter‑claim for m

Tags

financial-flow-minor-mention-ojeffrey-epsteinlegal-strategymalicious-prosecutioncivil-litigationlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-abuse-allegationssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
JAMES PATTERSON Put simply, Epstein has made allegations that have no basis in fact. To the contrary, his lawsuit was merely a desperate measure by a serial pedophile to prevent being held account- able for repeatedly sexually abusing minor females. Epstein’s ulterior motives in filing.and prosecuting this lawsuit are blatantly obvious. Epstein’s behavior is another clear demon- stration that he feels he lives above the law and that because of his wealth he can manipulate the system and pay for law- yers to do his dirty work—even to the extent of having them assert baseless claims against other members of the Florida Bar. Epstein’s Complaint against Edwards and LM is nothing short of a far-fetched fictional fairy-tale with absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support his preposterous claims. It was his last ditch effort to escape the public disclosure by Edwards and his clients of the nature, extent, and sordid details of his life as a serial child molester. Edwards's Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted without equivocation. Edwards filed a counterclaim for malicious prosecution. “He sued me with knowingly made up, falsified facts’ Edwards says. And his sole motivation was to extort me into abandoning the legitimate cases I was pursuing against him on behalf of the victims, including the CVRA suit. He ultimately had to dismiss that case, literally on the morning our Summary Judgment was to be heard. I then sued him. We were set for trial. The judge granted me punitive damages in my claim. And then, in a separate case in Florida, one of the appellate courts basically abolis} in Florida. My case was our district ruled that stand and the tort is nm back to the trial court the State Supreme Cour Sarah Kellen “She said her name was C tion,” says a real estate a much later that I realized s In April of 2009, that a: Beach. For Clara, that littl Epstein’s big house on El Br. as Sarah Kellen. But not suc pay four thousand dollars a 2009,” says a Palm Beach re market. “But she stayed a lot round-the-world trip for at I Kellen had been a prime Prosecutors had considered c Marcinkova as potential c charges as part of the plea de the course of which it was < pleaded to something, he coul slapping her, once, on his jet.

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeCorrespondenceUnknown

Telephone message logs: DOJ-OGR-00032705

This document contains logs of telephone messages for various individuals, including Jeff, Mr. Epstein (potentially Jeffrey Epstein), and Sarah, on July 26, 2017. The messages indicate calls, requests to call back, and potential follow-up actions. The document is labeled with a 'Public Records Request No.' suggesting it was obtained through a public records request.

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Document alleges phone and private‑plane records link Jeffrey Epstein to sexual encounters with underage girls in Palm Beach, supporting probable‑c...

The passage provides concrete investigative leads – subpoenaed private‑plane logs, cell‑phone call logs, and specific dates tying Epstein’s flights to alleged victim contact. It implicates a high‑prof Subpoena obtained Epstein’s 2005 private‑plane records from Jet Aviation showing arrivals/departures Cell‑phone records of a witness (Sarah Kellen) show calls to victims and a person named Dobbs made

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01835168

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.