Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31816House OversightOther

Affidavit Seeking Release of Jeffrey Epstein Tape for Civil Trial Evidence

The passage reveals an affidavit from an attorney (Brad Feats/Edwards) requesting a tape of Jeffrey Epstein’s statements to be used as evidence in civil litigation involving alleged minor abuse. It id Attorney Brad Feats/Edwards filed an affidavit on April 23, 2010 requesting a tape of Epstein’s stat The tape is claimed to be critical for proving perjury, lack of remorse, and for the Jane Doe civi

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013466
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals an affidavit from an attorney (Brad Feats/Edwards) requesting a tape of Jeffrey Epstein’s statements to be used as evidence in civil litigation involving alleged minor abuse. It id Attorney Brad Feats/Edwards filed an affidavit on April 23, 2010 requesting a tape of Epstein’s stat The tape is claimed to be critical for proving perjury, lack of remorse, and for the Jane Doe civi

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinevidence-handlingcivil-litigationsexual-abuseperjurymedia-involvementlegal-exposureevidence-procurementhouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
“Tarte thes nor any of the other plaintiffs have been able to pabiigin even a single word of information aren .. Epstein about ci abuse of minor girls. -~ : 25. “| made a. good faith, -albeit unsuccessful, effort to resolve this: matter with ‘Anne B. Carroll, representing the Daily News: in order to’ avoid any court intervention. | explained. that we . needed ‘this tape for several reasons, including those cited by her. in her pleading. The tape is detrimental to. Epstein’s personal complaint against Mand me; the tape is evidence.of perjury. . ~~ : ; . committed’ by Epstein; the tape is the Best Evidence of his lack of remorse for his. actions and. will be | presented in the punitive. damages. phase of the civil trials against him; and, perhaps most important, , the tape is the only way that the jury considering Jane Doe’s case will be able to hear Epstein’ 's voice and , “awn statements about his abuse of Jane. Doe and other minor girls. Without the tape, the jury will not have: the opportunity to hear Epstein give any substantive: information about Jane Doe’ s complaint. Indeed, they will not have the: ‘opportunity to‘even hear Epstein’ s voice utter any. ‘substantive words other than (in essence} “I take the Fifth.” ~ As part of our discussion, Ms. Carroll told me'thatitwasa° 4 “stupid move” for Mr. Rush to play the tape or disclose the tape. to other people as he likely waived any © ne pan privilege. and that, as.a result of disclosing the tape, he was at risk of losing. his job. Lresponded that it . oe did not seem fair. that Mr..Rush lose his job or be. punished i in any way, but that | had an absolute duty to. . represent my client and that | would be failing in that duty if | did not pursue this critical BIBER. of evidence. - - I declare under penalty of perjury that the Ae forgoing true and correct. ie FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. - Dated this 23” day of April, 2010. _ Brad Feats Esq.. “The fatagaite, instrument was acknowledged before me this 234 day of or, 2010 by BRAD _ EDWARDS, who i is ersonally, known to me. oe : 2 ee ee em oe aeseacancctinl ramen Soap enbaf ond attanan NU Fe rermasou me 1, 2012 Denes a PRL. Sindee linden emer llintee an {

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.