Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31904House OversightOther

Bank of America Investment Outlook Highlights Trump Election as Market Catalyst

The document is an internal investment memo discussing market expectations after the 2016 election. It mentions Donald Trump’s victory but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or miscond Mentions Donald Trump's 2016 election win as an unlikely market catalyst. Predicts fiscal stimulus, tax reform, and pro‑growth policies under a Trump administration. Outlines a shift from fixed‑incom

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014525
Pages
8
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is an internal investment memo discussing market expectations after the 2016 election. It mentions Donald Trump’s victory but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or miscond Mentions Donald Trump's 2016 election win as an unlikely market catalyst. Predicts fiscal stimulus, tax reform, and pro‑growth policies under a Trump administration. Outlines a shift from fixed‑incom

Tags

political-riskfinancial-strategybank-of-americapolitical-influencedonald-trumpmarket-outlookinvestment-strategyhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Morris, Paul V Sent: 1/5/2017 3:31:54 PM To: Morris, Paul V CC: Lehane, Sean T Subject: The Year Ahead: A World of Change (Short Version Below For Convenience) Attachments: image001.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg; image005.png; image006.jpg The Year Ahead: A World of Change A continued rise in equities. Renewed investor confidence. Bond markets under pressure. Our Chief Investment Office explores the risks and opportunities of these and other trends shaping the year ahead. AS WE LOOK BACK ON 2016, one could characterize it as The Year of The Unlikely. It began with deep worries regarding China's growth path, a second wave of collapsing oil prices, a Federal Reserve (Fed) hiking into deflationary headwinds, the impact of negative interest rates in Europe and Japan, concerns over a potential U.S. recession, lower-quality corporate high yield problems, and U.S. consumers who might never spend their savings at the pump. All these worries hit at once in January and February, prompting the S&P 500 to fall over 10% from its 2015 closing level of 2043. The year, at that point, appeared bleak. Our view was to maintain a balanced and diversified position throughout the downturn, particularly for the long haul, due to our belief that the major concerns, although understandable, were simply not going to fully develop and asset prices would begin to track fundamentals more effectively through the remainder of the year. The potential for risk assets to climb higher was there but a catalyst was needed. For our full view on the year ahead, please read our December 2016 Monthly Letter. Exhibit 1: Mid-Cycle Slowdown Ended In Early 2016, When Oil and Dollar Stabilized) 120 Spot 01 Price: West Texas Incernwdlate _.(6-Alowth Moving erage. Left Scale! e 60— . 40 _____ Rea Broad Trade-Weighted Eachawr Value of theuss 20 46-14ontre Moving Average Right SCale Illy0eSiouidown ..................................................................103 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Source: EINCME; FRB/Haver Anatytics. Data as of December 5, 2016. 96 92 88 84 Past performance is no guarantee offuture results. Our core belief was centered on healthy consumers who would indeed pick up their spending from savings at the pump and become more confident as job growth continued and real incomes increased. We also believed U.S. financial conditions and the economic backdrop would improve in the second half of the year as the pressure from the strong dollar subsided and the deflationary effects of the collapse in oil prices began to fade. In other words, we were witnessing evidence that the mid-cycle slowdown that had hurt economic growth and corporate earnings was ending. [See Exhibit 1] Based on this core belief, the "grind it out" year for risk assets would be back on track, the business cycle would extend into 2017, bond yields would slowly shift higher, and equity markets had the potential to head toward previous highs. A series of unexpected outcomes At this point, we did not characterize 2016 as The Year of the Unlikely. However, if you consider specific events throughout the year in finance and sports, it is easy to see that now. We already mentioned the second plunge in oil prices to the mid-$20s per barrel to start the year, and bond markets in some areas of the world actually had negative yields—meaning the lender paid the entity issuing the bonds to take their money! This was unlikely. How about Brexit vote in Great Britain? Unlikely. In sports, Villanova University winning the national championship in men's college basketball (Nova's first championship since 1985), Leicester—the English football club— winning the Premier League (before this season began, British bookmakers listed them as a 5,000- to-1 shot to emerge as the champion), the Cleveland Cavaliers' first ever National Basketball Association championship and, of course, the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series for the first time since 1908! All unlikely. But they happened. Last but not least, in our own political backyard, we witnessed Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election last month. Also unlikely. We all know markets do not like uncertainty. However, sentiment can shift quickly if fundamentals are not negatively affected, and what was previously determined to be "unlikely" turns to enthusiasm as to what could be. "We expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to head higher well into 2017, with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018, which should underpin equities for most of the year." CHRISTOPHER HYZY CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Why this expansion can continue Business cycles typically last between five and seven years before fundamentals deteriorate, usually due to a policy error of some sort. This can produce a recession and/or a bear market, which tend to correct the excesses that have been built up and kick-start a new cycle. Bull markets and cycles do not die of old age—there needs to be a fundamental catalyst that emerges and pushes the trends back the other way. We are entering our ninth year in the current business cycle, despite all of the complexities and concerns that have come and gone since the financial crisis.. In fact, this cycle could have extended another few years along the same path, given the secular stagnation that prevailed. This era needed ultra-accommodative central bank monetary policy just to keep things stable and plodding along this far into the cycle. It also needed corporations willing to manage their earnings to the penny in a below trend growth world that offered little pricing power. And finally, this cycle needed U.S. and emerging market consumers to continue to switch from deleveraging to spending as their balance sheets and incomes improved. A return of "animal spirits" This dynamic could have continued for a bit, but monetary policy has become tired. Negative interest rates have become a headwind, not a tailwind, in our view. And, just like sports fans, investors need a catalyst to break from the past. Visible positive catalysts tend to turn into improved sentiment and confidence. Through the years, economists have called this "animal spirits." Animal spirits begin as hope, turn into enthusiasm, and ultimately need visible action to keep the spirited momentum going. After all, economics is a behavioral science. It is our view that we are breaking from the era of secular stagnation and heading into fiscal reflation. This new era is likely to have its fits and starts and will not be in a straight line. It should also include different stages and speeds from various economic regions globally. Furthermore, it should contain some "unlikely" outcomes. With any cycle, we will have to take the good (higher nominal growth) with the potential bad (higher volatility) and investors will have to reposition portfolios, rebalancing when necessary, in order to take advantage of the new era. Prior to the U.S. presidential election, and even dating back to the summer months when bond yields bottomed, the economy was already beginning to improve. Corporate earnings were picking up, the consumer was spending at a healthy clip, there were some subtle signs of positive surprises in European economic activity, and the downturn in emerging markets (and negative earnings revisions) ceased. We were certainly not waving the celebratory flag on growth, but the economy was getting up off the ground, which is what risk assets, including equities, need sometimes. However, the S&P 500—a major benchmark for U.S. stocks--had lost momentum heading into the election, as investors worried that the secular stagnation era would continue and that monetary policy had lost its effectiveness. Market sentiment changed dramatically during the early morning hours on November 9. The surprise victory by Donald Trump caught many investors off-guard. The potential for fiscal stimulus measures, reduced regulation, corporate tax reform and other potential pro-growth initiatives increased. Animal spirits perked up. Investor positioning was heavily skewed toward long-duration fixed income, low-volatility equities and high-dividend-paying companies. These areas significantly outperformed in the first half of the year but started to lose momentum once rates bottomed mid-year. However, investor positioning did not change materially at first. Portfolios were still generally overexposed to higher- quality, rate-sensitive investments— otherwise known as "bond proxies." In our Hills Have Eyes strategy report, published on November 16, we outlined the need to rebalance portfolios given our belief that we were already transitioning toward the late-cycle expansion phase and that the new enthusiasm for pro-growth policies would begin to accelerate investor flows toward more cyclical investments. Given the high degree of underexposure to late- cycle investments by investors, we believed such a rotation would cause a "melt-up" in equities toward new highs over time. Diversification and rebalancing will be key So, how are we going to manage portfolios in a world undergoing a major market regime shift, one that is transitioning from the era of secular stagnation to fiscal reflation, and one that still has a considerable amount of uncertainty? We are going to become more prescriptive, remain diversified and balanced, but with more exposure to pro-growth, pro-cyclical areas. We will also likely rebalance more often throughout the year as investor rotation gathers momentum during 2017 and into 2018; and we look to periods of volatility as opportunities to add to areas we favor. "Fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatility dampener in unforeseen worst-case scenarios." CHRISTOPHER HYZY CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, BANK OF AMERICA GLOBAL WEALTH AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT We expect business, consumer and investor confidence to continue to head higher well into 2017, with most of the newly expected growth to come in 2018, which should underpin equities for most of the year. Higher nominal growth, an improved picture for corporate profits and continued positive sentiment are the foundation for continued gains in the equity markets and an investor rotation from overexposure to long-dated fixed income into under owned equities. This rotation will need a few periods of confirmation, given the still uncertain broader global macro outlook, but we expect price-to-earnings multiples to remain elevated, despite higher rates, throughout the year. S&P 500 earnings have a wide range of forecasts due to the potential for sizable tax cuts in 2017. Based on this, the S&P 500 could add extra earnings on top of normalized growth, which is expected to be around 9%. At present, a reasonable range, albeit a wide one, is considered to be between $129 and $138 with the potential for further upside. In this scenario, where we get pro-growth policies filtering into a higher earnings number, an S&P 500 bull case level of 2700 at the high end is possible. Improving profits and growth should take equities higher For now, a base case utilizing the five factor framework from BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, which combines sentiment, valuation and technical, equates to 2300 for the S&P 500 at year end. The two components that include long-term valuation and 12-month price momentum are indicating that S&P 500 levels between the base and bull case are increasing in probability. Of course, there are a number of scenarios that could unfold that would indicate a wide range of outcomes depending on the multiple or earnings number that ultimately develops. In the end, it all comes down to the path of corporate profits and the visibility on growth, both of which are improving. Highlights We have moved from a "get paid to wait" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical- and value- oriented theme in multi-asset portfolios • Equities remain attractive versus fixed income on a relative basis. • Within equities. we favor U.S. large caps. U.S. small caps and emerging markets. • Within equities, we favor value over growth and more cyclical assets versus defensives. • Within fixed income. we prefer credit to Treasuries. We would also consider an allocation to Treasury inflation protected securities (TIPS) where appropriate. Portfolio repositioning is likely to continue well into 2017, as developments unfold and the pro- cyclical environment gathers momentum. With growth already heading higher from Q3 2016 onward and earnings turning positive, investors have begun increasing cyclicality and exposure to value in portfolios at the expense of more defensive sectors and higher-dividend areas within equities. In addition, we expect a larger shift in emphasis toward small capitalization, which has already started, and more domestic-oriented equities due to a slightly stronger dollar, more pro- growth policies and the desire for a hedge against potential retaliatory trade policies from main trading partners. This portfolio shift in positioning is happening but, in our view, is in its early stages. We have moved from a "get paid to wait" core portfolio theme to a more cyclical and value- oriented theme in multi-asset and all-equity portfolios primarily due to increased business and consumer confidence, which should lead to higher earnings than originally expected. • Therefore, we have raised our exposure to equities versus fixed income to a moderate overweight and our new tactical asset allocation view is overweight equities versus its strategic benchmark. • We are now further underweight fixed income versus equities, underweight versus its strategic benchmark rather than neutral, and have lowered cash to neutral from overweight. Within the asset classes, we have made a number of changes consistent with our view from earlier this year and one that has accelerated post-election. • We are now moderately overweight U.S. small capitalization equities and neutral non-U.S. developed markets. • We maintain our preference for U.S. high-quality large caps and continue to overweight emerging markets. • We continue to favor value over growth and more cyclical areas (such as financials and consumer discretionary) versus defensives (such as utilities and consumer staples). In fixed income, we have moved from a balanced view to a larger underweight versus the strategic benchmark. • However, fixed income still represents an important portfolio diversifier___and a volatility dampener in unforeseen worst-case scenarios___and should be viewed primarily as a cash flow producer versus a total return asset, given the expectations for higher yields. • In addition, we have lowered Treasuries to a further underweight but maintain our neutral rating on high yield and underweight on international fixed income. • Municipal bonds have corrected to levels that are becoming attractive again, and we are still favorable on investment grade corporate credit. • We maintain our neutral rating on real estate and commodities, but we prefer metals and oil to gold. In addition, the pro-cyclical improvement has started to break down the elevated correlation among and within asset classes since earlier in 2016. We expect this adjustment to continue in 2017 as economic volatility picks up and asset class volatility follows suit. Transitions to late-cycle phases tend to invite a higher level of volatility as inflation rises and central bank policies shift to nudging short rates higher. In this environment, alternative investments, namely hedge funds, should outperform industry benchmarks, in contrast to recent underperformance. For investors able to withstand a higher allocation of illiquid assets in their portfolio, we prefer timberland for its long term-growth prospects and low correlation to financial assets. Paul V. Morris Managing Director I The Morris Group Private Banking & Investment Group Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Bank of America Tower I One Bryant Park (28) New York, NY 10036 r PRIVATE BANKING & !-DPi Lynch INVESTMEN T GROUP This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

SWIFT/BICCHRISTOPHER
URLhttp://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer
Wire Refreflation

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: FBI News Briefing

From: FBI News Briefing To: "FBINewsBriefing" Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - FBI Daily News Briefing - November 4, 2025 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 11:15:12 +0000 Importance: Normal ce. View in Browser pFederal Bureau of Investigation Seal November 04, 2025 Federal Bureau of Investigation Daily News Briefing (In coordination with the Office of Public Affairs) Email Public Affairs to subscribe to the Daily News Briefing. Mobile version and archive available here. Table of Contents • Continued Reporting: Director Patel Defends Country Star Girlfriend Amid Jet Scandal and Attacks EFTA00163886 EFTA00163887 EFTA00163888 Continued Reporting: Director Patel Defends Country Star Girlfriend Amid Jet Scandal and Attacks Two articles from The National Desk (11/03, Mallon) reported that Director Patel publicly defended his girlfriend, country music singer Alexis Wilkins, amid mounting criticism and scrutiny over his use of a government jet, calling out what he described as malicious

16p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities

The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Personal email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. with trivial remarks

The content consists of casual, non‑business conversation with no mention of financial transactions, wrongdoing, or high‑level officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Exchange appears to be personal, arranging a meeting in New York. Contains a vague, unrelated comment about Donald Trump. Repeated legal disclaimer about confidentiality and privilege.

2p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

List or Index of Names: DOJ-OGR-00022370

The document is a list of names, including individuals and entities, with some personal contact information redacted. It includes a range of names, from public figures to potentially private individuals. The document ID 'DOJ-OGR-00022370' suggests a connection to an official or legal context.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Satirical TV clips referencing Donald Trump and alleged rape statistics

The passage consists of comedic excerpts from The Daily Show and The Nightly Show with no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable information linking powerful actors to misconduct. It Quotes attributed to Donald Trump about Central American women and rape. Satirical commentary by Jon Stewart and Larry Wilmore. No specific dates, locations, or evidence provided.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.