Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-32149House OversightDeposition

Court transcript excerpt referencing Ms. Giuffre's testimony and school records

The passage contains generic courtroom commentary about evidence admissibility and school records, with no specific names of influential actors, financial transactions, or novel allegations. It offers Mentions Ms. Giuffre denying theft and attributing it to her boyfriend. Discusses admissibility of evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence. Notes absence of school records for Ms. Giuffre during 199

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011383
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains generic courtroom commentary about evidence admissibility and school records, with no specific names of influential actors, financial transactions, or novel allegations. It offers Mentions Ms. Giuffre denying theft and attributing it to her boyfriend. Discusses admissibility of evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence. Notes absence of school records for Ms. Giuffre during 199

Tags

court-transcriptevidenceevidence-admissibilityschool-recordslegal-exposuretestimonyhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 80 H3VOGIU1 prescribed over a period of time, and you'll understand that this is not a situation of someone being a drugee and doctor shopping, something that's in the news a lot these days. So trying to submit it that way is not only irrelevant to this case, but the prejudice greatly outweighs whatever probative value it might be. Ms. Giuffre would not, of course, object to testifying with regard to what current medication she takes, but that's a different subject altogether. With regard to criminal history, as I mentioned, Ms. Giuffre denied that she stole the money. She said her boyfriend took the money while he was there with her. And defense counsel reminded Court that this victim is a thief. Again, none of this information comes in under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Even the charging document and the warrant are classic hearsay and should be excluded. With regard to the next one, I'm going to skip ahead to school records. The records don't show that she was in school, as much as defendant seems to think she is. They don't have also what days she attended and what days she doesn't. It doesn't say that she was there on, for example, May 23rd, 2000 What they do show is that there are no courses taken between 1999 and the 2000 school year, and no courses taken during the 2000 to 2001 school years. Ms. Giuffer's attempt to work and resume school at another school as as a tenth grader in the 2001 to 2002 school SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.