Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-32251House OversightOther

Email discussing SEO manipulation for Jeffrey Epstein's domains and foundations

The passage reveals a coordinated effort to manipulate search engine results for Jeffrey Epstein's websites and related entities, indicating possible reputation management and concealment tactics. It Tyler Shears is hired to boost Jeffrey Epstein‑related URLs using SEO tactics. Discussion of “non‑website URLs” and “first page” placement to suppress negative search results. Reference to invoices d

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #029547
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a coordinated effort to manipulate search engine results for Jeffrey Epstein's websites and related entities, indicating possible reputation management and concealment tactics. It Tyler Shears is hired to boost Jeffrey Epstein‑related URLs using SEO tactics. Discussion of “non‑website URLs” and “first page” placement to suppress negative search results. Reference to invoices d

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinseo-manipulationreputation-managementonline-disinformationfinancial-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightonline-influence-operationfinancial-invoice

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Christina Galbraith RE > wrote: Hi Tyler, Ok thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon. Christina Galbraith Begin forwarded message: From: Tyler Shears (i Date: February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST To: Christina Galbraith a > Subject: Re: boosting strategy We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for "Jeffrey Epstein" in general. I had reserved the approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like. Getting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our "ideal" first page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page) From there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the "short-term" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated first page. I feel like time was lost focusing on making sure it was Mr. Epstein properties when he has giving explicit permission to promote any URL required to dislodge the negatives. I hope this makes sense.. I haven't heard from Rich on the last invoice I sent (1/29/14) and am hoping all is well. Do you know if he's out of the office ? On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Christina Galbraith i wrote: Hi Tyler, Im at a Kinko's. | see that you're boosting non-website url's -- are you sure this is the right approach? (vs. boosting Jeffrey's sites?) the .org and foundation sites are slipping down and the USVI and science are permanently off the first page. Thanks for you input. Christina

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.