Allegations linking Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz to U.S. terrorism conspiracy and corporate ties

820 1533, 1537 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (holding corre- spondent banking relationships insufficient to create general personal jurisdiction). NCB offers its customers the opportunity to open accounts directly with United States-based securities broker-dealers, but NCB does not act as a broker-dealer for securities sold in the United States and is not so licensed. Juco Decl. 114; Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc., 519 F.2d 974, 998 (2d Cir.1975) (finding Canadian securities broker not “doing business” in New York when it arranges for its Canadian custom- ers to buy and sell U.S. securities through U.S. broker). In 2002, less than 2% of the securities NCB traded for its own account were issued by U.S. entities. Juco Decl. 915; Schenker, 2002 WL 1560788, at *3-5 (finding that a single bank account in the United States, constituting small fraction of defendant’s total assets, is insufficient to form the basis for personal jurisdiction). [65] Taken individually, NCB’s con- tacts with the United States would not satisfy due process requirements. Howev- er, when they are examined as a whole— the presence of a branch office until 1992, a subsidiary until 2001, taking advantage of the privilege of its presence in New York by instigating a lawsuit in this forum, advertisements in U.S. publications—the Court finds that they may, with the help of limited jurisdictional discovery, comport with due process. NCB’s motion to dis- miss is therefore denied without prejudice. 7. Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz is a Defen- dant in the Burnett action. He is the son of Defendant Khalid bin Mahfouz and a director of the Defendant charity Blessed Relief Society, also known as Muwaffaq. Burnett Complaint 11331; 445. Blessed 37. The Burnett Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims against Nimir LLC. See Mem. in 349 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES Relief is a branch of the Human Concern International Society, which Osama bin Laden identified as a supporter in 1995. Id. 1333. He is a shareholder and the CEO of former Defendant Nimir, LLC, also known as Nimir Petroleum Ltd. Jd. 1443." Finally, Plaintiffs claim that Mr. bin Mahfouz was a member of the board and Vice Chairman of the Executive Man- agement Committee of Defendant National Commercial Bank. Jd. 1 445. Plaintiffs base their personal jurisdiction arguments on their claim that Mr. bin Mahfouz was a participant in the conspira- cy of terror that purposefully directed its conduct at the United States and included the September 11 hijackers. Plaintiffs also claim that he has business interests in the United States. Specifically he is a shareholder in U.S.-based companies, and his company, Al Murjan, allegedly has dealings with the American phone compa- ny Hughes Technologies, Inc. Mr. bin Mahfouz disputes the manner in which he was served. His name appeared in Plaintiffs’ notice by publication in The International Herald, which only has cir- culation of 199 in the entire Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Al Quds al-Arabia, which is banned in the Kingdom. He sub- mits that he has no personal contacts with the United States and there is no basis for exercising personal jurisdiction over him. [66] The Burnett complaint does not contain any specific actions by Mr. bin Mahfouz from which the Court could infer that he purposefully directed his activities at the United States. His affiliations with entities that are alleged to have U.S. con- tacts will not sustain jurisdiction. Family Internet, 1999 WL 796177, at *4. Finally, being a shareholder in a United States Supp. of Motion to Dismiss Ex. 1. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017885