Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34184House OversightOther

Attorney offers advice on handling high‑profile celebrity cases, referencing Woody Allen and Clinton‑Lewinsky

The passage is a personal commentary on best practices for lawyers in celebrity cases and contains no concrete allegations, transactions, or new information linking powerful individuals to misconduct. Mentions Woody Allen, Mia Farrow, and the Clinton‑Lewinsky impeachment as examples of high‑profile s Provides a list of procedural guidelines for attorneys representing celebrities. Notes media influ

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017375
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a personal commentary on best practices for lawyers in celebrity cases and contains no concrete allegations, transactions, or new information linking powerful individuals to misconduct. Mentions Woody Allen, Mia Farrow, and the Clinton‑Lewinsky impeachment as examples of high‑profile s Provides a list of procedural guidelines for attorneys representing celebrities. Notes media influ

Tags

celebrity-lawmedia-influencelegal-advicehouse-oversighthighprofile-cases

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4.2.12 WC: 191694 I responded, “If I wanted any of Mia’s former husbands to put the fear of God in Woody Allen, I'd pick Sinatra over you Mr. Previn.” He laughed in agreement. I have maintained a good relationship with Mia. Woody Allen eventually married Soon-Yi, and they have adopted children. Their marriage seems to be working. Both the Clinton-Lewinsky impeachment and Woody Allen-Mia Farrow cases involved sordid accusation of improper sexual conduct by famous and powerful men. These kinds of accusation directed against these kinds of men are grist for the media mill. Every legal and political move is covered in detail. Everyone has an opinion. Litigating in such an environment is perilous. Every mistake is magnified. You don’t learn how to manage such cases in law school. There are no tule books. Experience is the only teacher. After years of experience in dozens of high profile cases, I now try to teach my students how to avoid, really minimize, inevitable mistakes. Here are some of my everchanging rules: 1. Never take a case just because the client is a celebrity or because the case is “high profile.” Make sure the issues in the case are within your area of expertise. 2. Ifyou do take the case, don’t “hang out,” “chill” or socialize with the celebrity. (It is ok to get an autograph for your kid, but that’s all.) Never assume the celebrity, or high profile client, is your friend. You have an entirely professional relationship. Charge your usual fee. No discount, no gauging. 3. Never say anything about the client or the case to anyone unless you are prepared to see it in The New York Times or The National Enquirer. 4. Every time you meet the client, be prepared to be fired for telling him or her what they don’t want to hear. Famous people often get bad medical treatment and bad legal service for the same reason: the doctor and lawyer don’t want to offend or upset them and care more about keeping the patient or client than telling them the painful truth. 5. Don’t pretend your celebrity or high profile case is just like an ordinary case. The media is watching your every move, and every move should take into account the anticipated media coverage. This doesn’t mean you should make or refrain from making the right move because of the anticipated coverage, but rather you should consider (and perhaps reject, but at least consider) what is the right move. 6. Remember that judges, jurors and prosecutors, their family members, their friends and colleagues all watch television and read the papers. The media environment may have an impact on their decisions. 7. Remember that high profile and celebrity cases tend to distort the legal system, because the law treats famous people differently. Sometimes better. Sometimes worse. Never the same. It has been said that hard cases make bad law. So, often, do high profile cases. 288

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.