Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34331House OversightOther

Supreme Court narrows insider‑trading tipper liability in Salman v. U.S., lowering the “pecuniary benefit” requirement

The passage merely recaps a published Supreme Court decision and related commentary on the DOL fiduciary rule. It contains no new allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerf Salman v. U.S. overturns the Newman “pecuniary benefit” standard for insider‑trading tipper liabilit The ruling makes it easier for the SEC and prosecutors to pursue cases where insiders tip family o

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019856
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely recaps a published Supreme Court decision and related commentary on the DOL fiduciary rule. It contains no new allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerf Salman v. U.S. overturns the Newman “pecuniary benefit” standard for insider‑trading tipper liabilit The ruling makes it easier for the SEC and prosecutors to pursue cases where insiders tip family o

Tags

legal-precedentfiduciary-ruleinsider-tradingdepartment-of-laborregulatory-impactsecsupreme-courthouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
faSadisGoldbers, Edited by Yelena Maltser « ymaltser@sglawyers.com S&G INVESTMENT MANAGER , SUPREME COURT REJECTS NEWMAN REQUIREMENT OF “PECUNIARY OR SIMILARLY VALUABLE” PERSONAL BENEFIT FOR INSIDER TRADING LIABILITY FOR ‘TIPPING FAMILY AND FRIENDS BY SAMUEL J. LIEBERMAN The U.S. Supreme Court gave the government a major victory in Salman v. U.S.,. which lowers the standard for proving insider trading involving tipping family or friends, and will embolden the government to bring similar cases. Sa/man holds that a gift of inside information to a family or friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tip- ping liability—even If the tipper did not receive a valuable guid pro quo in exchange for the tip. This significantly narrows U.S. v. Newman, in which Salman will almost certainly embolden the SEC and federal prosecutors to bring more insider trading cases, because it is much easier for the government to prove a “gift” to a “friend” than to prove a “pecuniary” or similar quid pro quo. the Second Circuit (a lower appellate court) held that a tipper must receive “at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature,” (continued on page 2) Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule BY DANIEL G. VIOLA Reprinted with permission of Hedgeweek The Department of Labor's (the “DOL’) new fiduciary ruling (the “Rule”) has created strife in the securities industry and has the potential to significantly impact how financial advisers and brokers will manage retirement accounts in the future. Currently, brokers, financial advisers, and other finance professionals do not legally have to act in a client’s best interest, with few exceptions, such as those who are registered as investment advisers with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or in individual states. Those who are not registered, like brokers, just have to prove that the investment is suitable, not necessarily the best option, for their client—no matter that that fund might be more expensive and provide (continued on page 2) a Inside this Issue 1 Supreme Court Rejects Newman Requirement of “Pecuniary or Similarly Valuable” Personal Benefit for Insider Trading Liability for Tipping Family and Friends Status of the New DOL Fiduciary Rule A Cautionary Tale in the Use of Non- Compete Agreements The Question On All Of Our Minds: What Impact Will the Trump Administration Have on the Hedge Fund Industry? Compliance Deadlines — Second Quarter 2017 SEC & FINRA Release 2017 Exam Priorities Gregory Hartmann Joins Sadis & Goldberg's Corporate and Financial Services Practices Recent and Upcoming Events

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailymaltser@sglawyers.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.