Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Gaffney recommended low-level sex offender designation for Jeffrey Epstein despite board recommendation
The passage reveals a specific prosecutorial decision that contradicts a state board's recommendation to classify Epstein as a high‑risk sex offender. It provides a concrete name, role, and action tha ADA Jennifer Gaffney argued for a level‑one designation for Epstein despite NYBSO's level‑three reco NYBSO cited compelling evidence of abuse of multiple underage girls. The decision could reflect pr
Summary
The passage reveals a specific prosecutorial decision that contradicts a state board's recommendation to classify Epstein as a high‑risk sex offender. It provides a concrete name, role, and action tha ADA Jennifer Gaffney argued for a level‑one designation for Epstein despite NYBSO's level‑three reco NYBSO cited compelling evidence of abuse of multiple underage girls. The decision could reflect pr
Persons Referenced (2)
“.... Epstein, 89 A.D.3d at 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d at 240. Remarkably, New York Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Gaffney ignored the NYBSO recommendation and asked the trial court tasked with deciding Epstein’s sex-offen...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...r Sex Crimes and Designation as a Level Three Sex Offender In June 2008, a Florida Court sentenced Jeffrey Epstein to eighteen months in prison after he pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a fourteen-yea...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
3930033Related Documents (6)
From: '
From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: SDNY News Clips Monday, August 19, 2019 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:11:19 +0000 Yes, I saw. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 5:17 PM To: (USANYS) < Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Monday, August 19, 2019 According to WSJ, there were two prosecutors in DANY who handled Epstein's effort to get reduced sex offender level: Jennifer Gaffney and Pat Egan. Documents Show Efforts by Jeffrey Epstein's Attorneys to Sway Prosecutors WSJ By Joe Palazzolo 8/18/19 Local prosecutors in Manhattan labeled Jeffrey Epstein a low-level sex offender nearly a decade ago, against the recommendation of a state panel of experts and to the shock of a New York judge. Documents obtained through a public-records request provide new insight into how Mr. Epstein wielded influence within the criminal justice system, as his lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis LLP tried to prevent the financier from having to report to New York City police regularl
(USANYS)"
From: (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" c Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Monday, August 19, 2019 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:17:23 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-19.pdf According to WSJ, there were two prosecutors in DANY who handled Epstein's effort to get reduced sex offender level: Jennifer Gaffney and Pat Egan. Documents Show Efforts by Jeffrey Epstein's Attorneys to Sway Prosecutors WSJ By Joe Palazzolo 8/18/19 Local prosecutors in Manhattan labeled Jeffrey Epstein a low-level sex offender nearly a decade ago, against the recommendation of a state panel of experts and to the shock of a New York judge. Documents obtained through a public-records request provide new insight into how Mr. Epstein wielded influence within the criminal justice system, as his lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis LLP tried to prevent the financier from having to report to New York City police regularly or appear in a public sex-offender database. Attorneys Jay Lefkowitz and Sandra Musumeci recruited the former st
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. • • x ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEaft 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5sg Transcript. dated
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 19 1 o4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Government, Defendant. —x • x USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter, this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5ss Transcript, dated July 8, 2019
425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES
306 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES t In short, the issue now before the Court has arisen only because Donziger unjustifi- ably has refused to comply with his discov- ery obligations. Had he done so — i.e., had he produced responsive documents as to which there was no colorable claim of priv- ilege, submitted a privilege log as to re- sponsive documents as to which there was such a colorable claim, and submitted any disputes for judicial resolution - there would be no need to examine his ESI. But he has not. And the Court thus must take appropriate action. His arguments to the contrary are meritless. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court has entered the protocol for imaging and forensic examination of Donziger's elec- tronic devices and media. SO ORDERED. the six months between being served with the document requests and the Court's eventual ruling, on October I8, 2018, that Donziger had waived any applicable privi- lege. Third, Donziger disregards the
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. • • x ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEaft 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5sg Transcript. dated
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.