Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34531House OversightOther

Proposed Federal Rule Changes to Allow Closed‑Circuit Broadcasts and Victim Participation in Sentencing for Petty Offenses

The passage discusses academic proposals for procedural reforms to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, focusing on victim rights and closed‑circuit transmission. It contains no specific names, tr Suggests courts may televise trials via closed‑circuit for victims, citing the Oklahoma City bombing Proposes Rule 58 to require victim statements at sentencing even for petty offenses. References th

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017765
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses academic proposals for procedural reforms to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, focusing on victim rights and closed‑circuit transmission. It contains no specific names, tr Suggests courts may televise trials via closed‑circuit for victims, citing the Oklahoma City bombing Proposes Rule 58 to require victim statements at sentencing even for petty offenses. References th

Tags

federal-criminal-procedurelegal-scholarshiplegal-reformclosedcircuit-transmissionprocedural-changehouse-oversightsentencing-reformvictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 51 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, #922 (b) Closed-Circuit Transmission for Victims. In order to permit victims of crime to watch criminal trial proceedings, the court may authorize closed-circuit televising of the proceedings for viewing by victims or other persons the court determines have a compelling interest in doing so. The Rationale: The CVRA grants victims the right to attend trials, as noted previously in connection with proposed Rule 43.1. 74° At the same time, however, the CVRA recognizes that in situations with numerous victims, the court may have to craft "a reasonable procedure" to protect victims’ rights. 34! One such reasonable procedure would appear to be closed-circuit transmission of court proceedings to a facility sufficiently large to accommodate all the victims. This was the procedure followed in the Oklahoma City bombing case. *47 [*923] The proposed rule would authorize such transmission in appropriate cases. The language for the proposed rule comes from 42 U.S.C. /0608(a), which authorizes closed-circuit transmissions "notwithstanding any provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to the contrary" in cases in which a proceeding has been transferred more than 350 miles - as was the case with the Oklahoma City bombing trial. In light of the CVRA's mandate that the court must always craft "a reasonable procedure" to protect the rights of multiple victims, there is no compelling reason to tie the device to such geographical circumstances. The proposed rule authorizes courts to allow such transmissions in any appropriate case. Rule 58 - Victims and Petty Offenses The Proposal: Courts should hear from victims regarding sentences in petty cases as follows: Rule 58. Petty Offenses and Other Misdemeanors. (3) Sentencing. The court must give the defendant an opportunity to be heard in mitigation and then proceed immediately to sentencing. The court must also give victims an opportunity to be heard. The court may, however, postpone sentencing to allow the probation service to investigate or to permit either party to submit additional information. The Rationale: The CVRA gives a "victim" the right to be heard at sentencing. The CVRA defines "victim" as including anyone who is directly and proximately harmed by "a Federal offense." *47 The Act does not limit those offenses to felonies or misdemeanors. Accordingly, a victim has a right to be heard at sentencing for any petty offense, as would be reflected in the proposed rule. [*924] Conclusion The CVRA commands that victims be made participants in the federal criminal process and thus requires significant changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Article has provided one possible and comprehensive way to implement that congressional command with specific language and supporting analysis for each change. Undoubtedly there are other ways of 340 See supra notes 277-308 and accompanying text. 341 18 USCA. 3771(d)(2). 342 See Paul G. Cassell & Robert F. Hoyt, The Tale of Victims’ Rights, Legal Times, Dec. 23, 1996, at 32; Jo Thomas, Trial to Be Shown in Oklahoma for Victims, N.Y. Times, Jan. 30, 1997, at A14. 343 18 U.S.C.A. 3771 (e). DAVID SCHOEN

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflected

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.