Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-34590House OversightOther

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013370
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincivil-litigationlegal-filinglegal-exposurehouse-oversightsummary-judgment

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009CA 040800XXX XMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. : SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, / DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS’S RENEWED MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.510, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves for Final Summary J udgment and in support thereof states as follows: I. INTRODUCTION The pleadings and discovery taken to date show that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and that Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. is entitled to summary judgment for all claims brondhe against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein’s Second Amended Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards’ involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against Epstein. Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards — L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe — and Edwards properly and successfully

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Tied to Jeffrey Epstein Victims and Legal Team

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, investigators, and staff linked to the RRA firm and the Jeffrey Epstein case, revealing a network of legal and investigative personnel. While it d Lists over 30 individuals associated with RRA, many identified as attorneys, investigators, or staff Includes multiple counsel for other Epstein victims, suggesting a coordinated legal effort. Names

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.