Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-35242House OversightOther

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney hired by Epstein after investigating him, alleged role in facilitating underage sexual abuse

The passage ties a former federal prosecutor (Reinhart) directly to Jeffrey Epstein’s network, suggesting a conflict of interest and possible obstruction of justice. It provides specific names, dates, Reinhart was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida during the criminal inve Reinhart left the U.S. Attorney’s Office and was immediately hired by Epstein to represent his pil

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010588
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage ties a former federal prosecutor (Reinhart) directly to Jeffrey Epstein’s network, suggesting a conflict of interest and possible obstruction of justice. It provides specific names, dates, Reinhart was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida during the criminal inve Reinhart left the U.S. Attorney’s Office and was immediately hired by Epstein to represent his pil

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinhigh-importancelegal-ethicsconflict-of-interestghislaine-maxwellsexual-abuseobstruction-of-justicefederal-prosecutionlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
all substantive questions regarding her role in arranging for minor girls to come to Epstein’s mansion to be sexually abused. Reinhart had previously been an Assistant United States Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida when Epstein was being investigated criminally by Reinhart’s office. Reinhart left the United States Attorney’s Office and was immediately hired by Epstein to represent Epstein’s pilots and certain co- conspirators during the civil cases against Epstein. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit “N” at 11. 59, Edwards also had other lines of legitimate discovery blocked through the efforts of Epstein and others. For example, Edwards learned through deposition that Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in managing Epstein’s affairs and companies. See deposition of Epstein's house manager Janusz Banziak, February 16, 2010 at page 14, lines 20-23 (Deposition Attachment #16); See deposition of Epstein's housekeeper Louella Rabuyo, October 20, 2009, page 9, lines 17-25 (Deposition Attachment #17); See deposition of Epstein's pilot Larry Eugene Morrison, October 6, 2009, page 102-103 (Deposition Attachment #18); See deposition of Alfredo Rodriguez, August 7, 2009, page 302-306 and 348 (Deposition Attachment #8); See also Prince Andrew's Friend, Ghislaine Maxwell, Some Underage Girls and A Very Disturbing Story, September 23, 2007 by Wendy Leigh, link at http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id= 1895OHANNA SJOBERG. Exhibit “AA”’. 60. Alfredo Rodriguez testified that Maxwell took photos of girls without the girls’ knowledge, kept the images on her computer, knew the names of the underage girls and their respective phone numbers and other underage victims were molested by Epstein and Maxwell together. See Deposition of Rodriguez, Deposition attachment # 8 at 64, 169-170 and 236. ex)

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

URLhttp://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile...

The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) an Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creati The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contac

84p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 76 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 2

70p
Court UnsealedJan 27, 2015

Exhibit 16 Epstein

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 Case Page 2 of I I Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts Case sass Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT individually, and BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the

40p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297437

Gratitude America - Google Search Page 1 of 1 403/, GrablUde IntoCa ck Alf Nen fl eas %know Maca atre 8-1linaS TWA, ;mow 44 300.033.4,6Sn 4031 SKWast GratitudeAmerica www.orasiudeamenetwei HONORING OUR. HEROES 'tannin Ow goner dew Reba. Restore. Recreate Reruns DotterteAppty lot a Reheat GratitudoAmetrices wassmn to 10 pomride Retreats Leadership Reba. Reface. & Reesman Out *Vets dem* a supoorton Van mutts Item gratiluleamened org • GratitudeAmerica. Inc - Home j Facebook

23p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.