Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-353House OversightCorrespondence

The memorandum of law argues that the pre-indictment delay has prejudiced Ghislaine Maxwell's abilit...

The memorandum of law argues that the pre-indictment delay has prejudiced Ghislaine Maxwell's ability to defend herself, citing lost witnesses, corrupted memories, and tactical delay by the government. The document presents a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the specific circumstances of the case. It contends that the government's delay was reckless and in bad faith, further supporting Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-353
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The memorandum of law argues that the pre-indictment delay has prejudiced Ghislaine Maxwell's ability to defend herself, citing lost witnesses, corrupted memories, and tactical delay by the government. The document presents a detailed analysis of the applicable law and the specific circumstances of the case. It contends that the government's delay was reckless and in bad faith, further supporting Maxwell's motion to dismiss the indictment.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Pre-indictment delayPrejudice to the defendant Ghislaine MaxwellTactical delay by the government
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.