Draft of 2008 Plea Agreement Negotiations Between Epstein’s Counsel and DOJ’s Child Exploitation Section

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

Draft of 2008 Plea Agreement Negotiations Between Epstein’s Counsel and DOJ’s Child Exploitation Section

Draft of 2008 Plea Agreement Negotiations Between Epstein’s Counsel and DOJ’s Child Exploitation Section The passage outlines the internal DOJ negotiation strategy and the terms of a state‑level plea that avoided federal registration and longer prison time. It provides concrete details (dates, statutes, officials) that could guide a deeper probe of how the agreement was reached, but the information is already broadly reported and lacks new evidence of wrongdoing by high‑level officials. Key insights: Negotiations involved the SDFL and DOJ’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS).; Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher was offered a 30‑day appeal window, which Epstein’s counsel declined.; The agreement swapped a federal prosecution for a state plea to solicitation and procurement of minors (Florida Statutes 796.07 and 796.03).

From: "

From: " To: ' Subject: RE: Our Seattle papers had the wire story Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:39:52 +0000 Importance: Normal We talked about the case when I was doing my research. She seems great so far. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 From: (USAWAW) Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:39 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Our Seattle papers had the wire story Who is the CEOS attorney? They're a mixed bag so I hope this one is helpful. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida , January 25, 2008 8:37 AM To: (USAWAW) Subject: RE: Our Seattle papers had the wire story I'm okay. We now have a CEOS attorney on the case while we await a meeting between Alice Fisher and Ken Starr. The lawsuit isn't great for us — except that I hope it makes Epstein understand that our plan to give each girl $150,000 is a heck of a lot better than $50 million for just one. And maybe they can take Epstein's deposition? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australia

EFTA Document EFTA01718407

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dispute Over Minor Procurement Charge in Epstein Case

Deferred Prosecution Agreement Dispute Over Minor Procurement Charge in Epstein Case The passage reveals internal conflicts between the defense, state prosecutors, and the State Department of Florida (SDFL) regarding the specific charge to be included in Epstein's Deferred Prosecution Agreement, including references to a threatened 53‑page indictment and a missed appeal to Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher. While it names high‑profile actors (Jeffrey Epstein, AAG Fisher) and suggests possible procedural obstruction, it lacks concrete evidence of wrongdoing, financial flows, or direct misconduct, limiting its immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Disagreement over whether Epstein should be charged with 'procurement of minors' (registrable) or 'solicitation of minors' (non‑registrable).; SDFL allegedly failed to provide factual allegations needed for a registrable offense despite multiple requests.; Defense faced a deadline threatening a 53‑page indictment identifying 40 minors and a potential 188‑month sentence.