Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36097House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein email to attorney David Schoen referencing Justice Breyer and U.S. Attorney's office

The passage is a routine attorney‑client email from Jeffrey Epstein to his lawyer, containing vague comments about Justice Breyer’s views on sentencing and a generic complaint about the U.S. Attorney’ Email sent by Jeffrey Epstein on Feb 22, 2010 to attorney David Schoen. Mentions a recent panel in DC where Epstein sat next to Justice Stephen Breyer. Comments that Justice Breyer believes the sente

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031494
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a routine attorney‑client email from Jeffrey Epstein to his lawyer, containing vague comments about Justice Breyer’s views on sentencing and a generic complaint about the U.S. Attorney’ Email sent by Jeffrey Epstein on Feb 22, 2010 to attorney David Schoen. Mentions a recent panel in DC where Epstein sat next to Justice Stephen Breyer. Comments that Justice Breyer believes the sente

Tags

sentencing-commissionstephen-breyerjeffrey-epsteinus-attorneyjudicial-commentarycourt-appealdavid-schoenlegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Any thoughts on the guy? Meanwhile, | hope all is going well for you now and | wish you a happy and healthy new year. David Schoen From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> To: Sent: Mon, Feb 22, 2010 5:09 pm Subject: Re: the strange person is On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, <> wrote: As terrible as the system is and has been to you, | have to tell you one encouraging thing. Last Friday | spoke ona panel in DC on the justice system. | was seated next to Justice Breyer and got to know him a bit. For what it is worth, he certainly seem to understand that the system is broken and | hear this more and more. Indeed, he made it very clear that he thinks the sentencing system (which he helped form as a member of the Sentencing Commission) is broken and while you are past having to deal with that, | would like to think this raises some hope that the rest of the system will improve if others in his position feel the same. Tomorrow | go to Alabama to argue before the court of appeals regarding the constitutionality of Alabama's Community Notification Act, which the lower court struck down as unconstitutional already. Ultra right wing court and election year, so who knows; but these laws are so Draconian. | saw that the U.S. Attorney's office is appearing in your civil cases as well. Some strange folks in that office. Anyway, | will look forward to talking and while all the judges are going to be tough, Judges Marra and Johnson so far have not been rubber stamps for government in my case and that means something. David EKER KEREREREEREREREREREREREREREREREREREEEE EERE EREREREREEE The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. <

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal analysis of victims' rights under the CVRA and reference to Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement

The passage discusses scholarly arguments about the scope of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and cites a letter from former Senator Jon Kyl to Attorney General Eric Holder, as well as the Jeffrey Epstei CVRA rights may not apply until formal charges are filed, per DOJ OLC memo (2010). Senator Jon Kyl objected to the DOJ interpretation, asserting victims' rights extend to investigativ The issue is hi

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Federal judge overseeing key Epstein lawsuit dies at 96

The passage merely reports the death of a judge handling an Epstein-related case, offering no concrete new leads, transactions, or actionable details. It references a publicly known case and provides U.S. District Court judge in New York died at age 96 Judge was presiding over a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein Judge described as overseeing a 'key' lawsuit

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court rulings expand victims' rights under CVRA to pre‑charge proceedings, potentially affecting Epstein non‑prosecution agreement

The passage outlines a line of case law that could be used to challenge the non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) granted to Jeffrey Epstein by arguing victims’ rights applied before charges were filed. Thi Multiple district courts have held that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) applies before formal c The Does v. United States decision suggests victims could seek relief that might invalidate Epstei

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal analysis of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its application to pre‑charge victim participation, citing the Jeffrey Epstein case

The passage discusses statutory interpretation of victims' rights and historical background, with only a generic reference to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It does not provide concrete new leads, specific CVRA may extend victim rights before formal charges are filed. Department of Justice’s position on CVRA scope is contested. Proposed test: rights attach when law‑enforcement can identify a specific v

2p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

FBI notified Epstein victims of CVRA rights before non‑prosecution agreement, suggesting DOJ misapplied victim‑rights statutes

The passage reveals that the FBI sent victim‑rights notices to Epstein’s alleged victims months before a non‑prosecution deal, implying the agency assumed CVRA applicability and later reversed its pos FBI sent a notice to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007, stating her rights under the CVRA. The notice preceded the non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein by over three months. The Department of Jus

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Email hints at possible settlement pressure on Jeffrey Epstein case and links to Clinton‑associated financiers

The passage references a settlement that prevents victim testimony in a high‑profile Epstein civil suit and labels Epstein as a ‘Clinton‑linked financier.’ While it offers no concrete names, dates, or Settlement reached in civil lawsuit that blocks victim testimony. Sender labels Epstein as a ‘wealthy, Clinton‑linked financier.’ Tone implies possible influence or pressure on the case outcome.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.