Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36135House OversightOther

Presidential Authority to Waive International Organization Immunities Under U.S. Immunities Act

The passage outlines legal mechanisms for the U.S. President to override immunity protections for international organizations, but provides no specific allegations, names, transactions, or misconduct. U.S. Immunities Act allows the President to waive, withdraw, condition, or limit immunities for inte Reference to UN dispute‑settlement provisions and World Bank/IFC alternative accountability mechan

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028573
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines legal mechanisms for the U.S. President to override immunity protections for international organizations, but provides no specific allegations, names, transactions, or misconduct. U.S. Immunities Act allows the President to waive, withdraw, condition, or limit immunities for inte Reference to UN dispute‑settlement provisions and World Bank/IFC alternative accountability mechan

Tags

world-bankinternational-organizationsimmunitylegal-frameworkhouse-oversightexecutive-authorityun

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cite as: 586 U.S. (2019) 15 BREYER, J., dissenting a suit would lead to “disruptive interference” with the organization’s functions, the waiver does not apply. bid. Other organizations have attempted to solve the liabil- ity/immunity problem by turning to multilateral, not single-nation, solutions. The UN, for instance, has agreed to “make provisions for appropriate modes of set- tlement of ... [d]isputes arising out of contracts or other disputes of a private law character.” Convention on Privi- leges and Immunities of the United Nations, Art. VIII, §29, 21 U.S. T. 1488, T. I. A.S. No. 6900. It generally does so by agreeing to submit commercial disputes to arbitration. See Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States §467, Reporters’ Note 7 (1987). Other organizations, including the IFC, have set up alter- native accountability schemes to resolve disputes that might otherwise end up in court. See World Bank, Inspec- tion Panel: About Us (deseribing World Bank’s three- member “independent complaints mechanism” for those “who believe that they have been ... adversely affected by a World Bank-funded project”), https://inspectionpanel.org/ about-us/about-inspection-panel (as last visited Feb. 25, 2019); Compliance Advisor Ombudsman, How We Work: CAO Dispute Resolution (describing IFC and Multi- lateral Investment Guarantee Agency dispute-resolution process, the main objective of which is to help resolve issues raised about the “social and environmental impacts of IFC/MIGA projects”), www.cao-ombudsman.org/howwework/ ombudsman. These alternatives may sometimes prove inadequate. And, if so, the Immunities Act itself offers a way for Amer- ica’s Executive Branch to set aside an organization’s im- munity and to allow a lawsuit to proceed in U.S. courts. The Act grants to the President the authority to “with- hold,” to “withdraw,” to “condition,” or to “limit” any of the Act’s “immunities” in “light of the functions performed by any such international organization.” 22 U.S. C. §288.

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.cao-ombudsman.org
URLhttps://inspectionpanel.org

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.