Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36320House OversightFBI Report

Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein threatens ABC over planned interview with Jane Doe 3, disputes allegations involving Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Prince...

The letter provides concrete leads – names (Jeffrey Epstein, Jane Doe 3, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Al Dershowitz, Prince Andrew), dates (interview planned for 2015, alleged events 2001‑2002), and referen Epstein’s counsel warns ABC that Jane Doe 3’s accusations are “grossly negligent” and uncorroborated Specific allegations link Bill Clinton and Al Gore to Epstein’s Virgin Islands estate, which the l

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028928
Pages
3
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The letter provides concrete leads – names (Jeffrey Epstein, Jane Doe 3, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Al Dershowitz, Prince Andrew), dates (interview planned for 2015, alleged events 2001‑2002), and referen Epstein’s counsel warns ABC that Jane Doe 3’s accusations are “grossly negligent” and uncorroborated Specific allegations link Bill Clinton and Al Gore to Epstein’s Virgin Islands estate, which the l

Tags

prince-andrewjeffrey-epsteinfinancial-motivemedia-suppressionmedia-manipulationforeign-influenceal-gorenonprosecution-agreementbill-clintonalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightjane-doe-3

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P. C. ATTORNEY AT LAW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 EMAIL ADDRESSES: BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX NIGHT EMERGENCY: April 24, 2015 Via Email and U.S. Mail John Zucker Assistant Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 77 W 66TH St, Room 1628 New York, NY 10023 Re: Good Morning America and Night Line interview with Jane Doe 3 Dear Mr. Zucker: I represent Jeffrey Epstein. I have been informed by Producer James Hill that ABC intends to air an interview, conducted by a Good Morning America co-host, of a woman known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 I write to put you on notice that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations is grossly negligent or worse. The accusations, many of which relate to my client, relate to alleged conduct that occurred approximately 15 years ago. The current accusations are simply reformatted and embellished echoes of previous allegations, which were first made by Jane Doe 3 to tabloid publications in the United Kingdom in 2011 and which have no independent news value. These allegations were then and remain now uncorroborated and have been refuted or undermined by other, credible evidence. Indeed, a federal judge recently refused to consider these allegations in pending litigation, finding them "immaterial and impertinent", while striking the allegations and denying Jane Doe 3s Motion to Join, See Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. United States, 08-CV-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), Dkt 324 at 5. In addition, in that very same litigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Timothy R. Slater filed a declaration stating that when Jane Doe 3 was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 she refused to cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein declaring she wanted nothing to do with the matter. For ABC to air these untested allegations on national television as "news" when Jane Doe 3 intentionally declined eight years ago to subject these same allegations to verification by the FBI would be grossly irresponsible and severely damaging to Mr. Epstein and others. 1 Mr. Hill informed me that she was waiving whatever rights to anonymity she might assert but I will, because of certain legal obligations, refer to her as Jane Doe 3. This is particularly true when ABC knows or should know that several, very specific allegations of Jane Doe 3 have been rebutted and/or demonstrated by others to be false. For example, I understand that she has accused distinguished Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School of sexual misconduct involving her. Professor Dershowitz has flatly denied that allegation under oath in a federal court proceeding. I further understand that Professor Dershowitz offered to play a tape recording for Mr. Hill that evidences that Jane Doe 3 has made recent contradictory statements—that is, that she was pressured into including Professor Dershowitz in her allegations and that she has a financial motive in making these allegations. The Duke of York and the Royal Palace have likewise unequivocally denied Jane Doe's similar allegations against the Duke. Surely, these unequivocal statements of denial of respected members of society are entitled to some deference by ABC, particularly where, as here, there is substantial evidence of bias, improper motive, and serious credibility problems of their accuser. Moreover, additional claims of Jane Doe 3 can be refuted with objective evidence that is readily obtainable by ABC. For example, she claims she was in the presence of both former President Clinton (after January 20, 2001, and before the summer of 2002) and former Vice President Gore (and his wife) at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. I have been told by Mr. Hill that she claims to be 100% sure of the facts regarding President Clinton. The claims are completely uncorroborated and compellingly contradicted by others. Neither former President Clinton nor former Vice-President Gore and his wife have ever been present at Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. A review of United States Secret Service records, obtainable through a Freedom of Information Request would prove the falsity of the claim. Virgin Island government records would provide further confirmation. I also believe that Mr. Hill has been told by individuals with percipient knowledge that former President Clinton has never been to Mr. Epstein's Virgin Island home. Upon inquiry, I am certain that you would receive similar denials from Mr. and Mrs. Gore either directly or by or through their counsel Mr. Boies. Jane Doe 3's fabrication of these claims against respected former officials undermines completely the trustworthiness of each and every one of her remaining allegations. We would expect that, in the wake of the damning independent review of Rolling Stone's publications of rape allegations involving students at the University of Virginia, ABC would proceed with similar, uncorroborated allegations with extreme caution. At the very least, ABC has an obligation to verify—with independent evidence—the truthfulness of Jane Doe 3's claims. Merely declining to air those portions of her interview that relate to President Clinton and Vice-President Gore is insufficient. If ABC has concerns about her credibility with respect to any allegation, it must decline to republish all of her allegations. In June of 2008, Mr. Epstein pleaded guilty to Florida state charges that do not relate to Jane Doe 3. After an extensive investigation, the United States declined to prosecute Mr. Epstein and provided him with a Non-Prosecution Agreement. Mr. Epstein fully conformed to the responsibilities and obligations imposed on him by that agreement. Mr. Epstein is not engaged in public activities. He is a private person who has complied and continues to comply with his legal obligations, and he is attempting to move forward with his life in a productive way. The allegations of Jane Doe 3 are neither credible nor news worthy. ABC should not publish them. Yours Truly, /s/Martin G. Weinberg CC James E Hill, ABC News

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreformatted

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop Five

Exhibit G Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1335-3 Filed 01/09/24 Page 1 of 223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONFIDENTIAL 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, -vs- CONFIDENTIAL ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ____________________________________/ VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF [REDACTED - Survivor] Saturday, January 16, 2016 9:07 a.m. - 2:48 p.

223p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein threatens ABC over pending interview with alleged victim Jane Doe 3

The letter identifies specific high‑profile figures (President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, the Duke of York) allegedly linked to Epstein’s island, a Epstein’s counsel cites a federal judge’s ruling striking Jane Doe 3’s allegations as immaterial (ca FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater’s 2007 declaration that Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with t

3p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
Court UnsealedJan 4, 2024

Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers

January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

943p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

DS9 Document EFTA00794556

159p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01412453

63p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.