Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36470House OversightOther

Alleged Trump Attendance at Jeffrey Epstein Parties Involving Minor Victims

The passage links a former president to alleged sexual assault parties hosted by Jeffrey Epstein, providing specific context (1994 parties, promises of money and modeling) and mentions anonymous plain Two anonymous women (Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe) allege sexual assault at parties hosted by Jeffrey Epste Tiffany Doe was an employee of Epstein, indicating possible insider testimony. The parties were he

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026386
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage links a former president to alleged sexual assault parties hosted by Jeffrey Epstein, providing specific context (1994 parties, promises of money and modeling) and mentions anonymous plain Two anonymous women (Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe) allege sexual assault at parties hosted by Jeffrey Epste Tiffany Doe was an employee of Epstein, indicating possible insider testimony. The parties were he

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinfinancial-inducementdonald-trumpminor-victimscivil-litigationsexual-assaultanonymitylegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 3 of 9 and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law. Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto. Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe are each pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. 8. Courts have discretion to allow proceeding anonymously where the need for privacy outweighs the public’s interest in knowing their identity and any prejudice to the defendants. Sealed Plaintiff-v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature, and identification of Plaintiff would pose a risk of retaliatory physical harm to her and to others. Exh. A. All of the ten factors that the Second Circuit articulated as relevant to this analysis favor anonymity, especially factors 1-4, 7, and 10 (e.g., factors one and two: “whether the litigation involves oo matters that are ‘highly sensitive and [of a] personal nature,’” and “’ whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the ... party [seeking to proceed anonymously] or 299 even more critically, to innocent non-parties’”.), or are neutral with respect to anonymity. Protecting Plaintiff’s anonymity is also appropriate as she is a rape victim. D. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B. On information and belief, by this time in 1994, Defendant

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:16-CV-04642

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.