Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-36498House Oversight

House Oversight Deposition Designation Dispute Highlights Procedural Arguments

Deposition

The excerpt discusses procedural arguments over deposition designations in a civil case, with no specific names, dates, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct involving high‑profile acto Counsel argues the opposing side failed to timely designate inadmissible testimony. Reference to using adverse inference against witnesses based on their answers. Mention of Southern District reporte

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011452
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.