jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]division and multiplication signs, rather than keeping them inside the paragraph
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Title Match
Case Filed-36498House OversightHouse Oversight Deposition Designation Dispute Highlights Procedural Arguments
November 11, 20251p3 persons
Case File
d-36498House OversightHouse Oversight Deposition Designation Dispute Highlights Procedural Arguments
Deposition
The excerpt discusses procedural arguments over deposition designations in a civil case, with no specific names, dates, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct involving high‑profile acto Counsel argues the opposing side failed to timely designate inadmissible testimony. Reference to using adverse inference against witnesses based on their answers. Mention of Southern District reporte
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011452
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.