Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36718House OversightFinancial Record

Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege

The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012403
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinpotential-financial-claimfinancial-flowpotential-misconductattorney-client-privilegelawsuitlegal-exposurehouse-oversightcongressional-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
—_ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 oO Oo OW NY TD oO FP WwW DY ~0929104. TXT Q. Other than conversations that you have had with Mr. Leopold -- |'m not asking about that -- are you aware that Mr. Leopold has filed a lawsuit in federal court. seeking fifty million dollars from Jeffrey Epstein on your behalf? MR. LEOPOLD: Same objection. Anything that you learn through conversations between you and me, do not answer. Those are protected. If you know through any other realm of Knowledge, you may answer. THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You have no idea that Mr. Leopold filed a Fifty million-dollar lawsuit on your behalf against Jeffrey Epstein? MR. LEOPOLD: Same objection. Do not answer that question if it's through 10 discussions that you and | had. Outside of that, you may answer. So do not answer that question if that is the only basis by which you understand that answer. THE WITNESS: No. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You didn't know that? MR. LEOPOLD: Don't answer that question. Against, it's attorney/client privilege. Any information you've learned through conversations between you and [ are protected. If you know it through any other realm, you may answer. MR. TEIN: Are you going to say that for Page 8

Related Documents (6)

House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt questioning witness about alleged Epstein involvement and police statements

The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about Jeffrey Epstein and a witness's statements, but lacks concrete names of powerful actors, specific dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It off Witness was asked if Epstein ever visited his father's house – answer: no. Witness denied that Epstein's associates tampered with his father's tires. Witness claimed to have told police they did not

1p
House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing referencing Epstein and parental police report

The passage contains a fragmented dialogue with no concrete names, dates, or transactions. It merely alludes to a police report about Jeffrey Epstein and mentions parental testimony, but provides no a Witness is questioned about a police report filed by their parents concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The dialogue suggests possible coaching of testimony, which could imply procedural improprieties. Refere

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 116 From ne Page 47/51 Date. 5/29/2008 12 09 L' • Si esta responder u la demanda per su cueille, al mismo tiempo en que prise= su respucsta ante il tribunal, debeni ustett envier por comme o entregar une copia de su rapueste a la persona denominada abaju corne "PlaintifUPlaintiffs Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). "De acuerdo con el Acto 6 Decreto de los Ameriennsos con Impedirnentos, inhabilitados, persona.; en necesidad del servicio special para panicipar en este procedimiento deberin, dcntm de un 'derme rezonable, antes de cualquier proœdimicnto, ponerse en contacto con is officine Administratutiva dc la Cone, 205 North Dixie Highway, oficina 52500, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Téléfono (561) 355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (I'DD) 6 1-800-955-8770 (V), Via Floride Relay Service". pv1FOR'FANT Des poursuites judiciaires ont etc entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours ormsecu

116p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

ROY BLACK

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010

49p
Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop Three

January 5, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

1391p
House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt shows alleged false statements to police about Jeffrey Epstein

The passage contains a vague interrogation about alleged false statements to police concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It lacks concrete names beyond Epstein, no dates, transactions, or actionable details, a Witness is questioned about lying to police regarding Epstein allegedly trying to murder his father. No documentary evidence or specific statements are presented. The dialogue references a prior tape

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.