Skip to main content
Skip to content
Interview with White‑Collar Defense Lawyer Reid Weingarten on High‑Profile Clients, Jury Strategy, and a Juvenile‑Justice FoundationInternal DOJ/FBI dynamics and Trump’s alleged view of control over the Justice Department
Case File
d-37260House OversightDeposition

Court Quashes Boies Subpoena and Partially Limits Jane Doe Deposition in Florida Civil Case

The document merely records a routine procedural ruling in a civil lawsuit, offering no concrete leads to influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions a high‑profile law firm (Boies Court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash its subpoena in full. Jane Doe No. 3's motion to quash was partially granted and partially denied. A confidentiality order was entered an

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015616
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document merely records a routine procedural ruling in a civil lawsuit, offering no concrete leads to influential actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions a high‑profile law firm (Boies Court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash its subpoena in full. Jane Doe No. 3's motion to quash was partially granted and partially denied. A confidentiality order was entered an

Persons Referenced (1)

Alan Dershowitz

“...DA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO, CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, Vv. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. / ORDER ON BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP AND JANE DOE NO, 3’s MOTIONS oe TO QUASH S...”

Tags

confidentialitycourt-ordercivil-litigationlegal-proceduresubpoenalegal-exposurehouse-oversightprocedural
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #015616

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17"! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO, CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, Vv. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. / ORDER ON BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP AND JANE DOE NO, 3’s MOTIONS oe TO QUASH SUBPOENAS OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER This Cause comes before the Court on November 2, 2015 upon Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Or For Protective Order and Jane Doe No. 3’s Motion to Quash Subpoena Or For Protective Order. Having reviewed. the record and being otherwise fully advised, the Court hereby Orders: 1. Non-Party Law Firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP’s Motion to Quash Subpoena is GRANTED. The subpoena to Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP is quashed in its entirety. 2. Non-Party Jane Doe No. 3’s Motion to Quash Subpoena or For Protective Order is Denied in Part, Granted in part, as follows: a. The Motion to Quash is Granted as to Requests Nos. 9, 17, 18, 20, and 23, The Motion is denied as to the remaining Requests. b. A Confidentiality Order shall be entered. ce. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 shall be limited to 4 hours without prejudice to request for additional time in the future. d. The deposition will be taken at the law firm representing the witness, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 37201585 E-Filed 01/29/2016 03:47:44 PM

25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

0p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe victims contest Alan Dershowitz’s motion for limited intervention, alleging he hides truth about sexual molestation claims

The passage provides a concrete legal filing that references specific parties (Alan Dershowitz, multiple Jane Does) and a motion for limited intervention, suggesting a potential avenue for further dis Dershowitz filed a motion for limited intervention in a civil case (9:08‑80736‑Civ‑Marra/Johnson). He claims an affidavit from Jane Doe #3 disproves her allegations, but the filing says no evidence w

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Potential testimony linking Alan Dershowitz to sexual abuse of minors in alleged Epstein case

The excerpt references a draft House oversight document that alleges Alan Dershowitz witnessed sexual abuse of a minor (Jane Doe #3) by Jeffrey Epstein. It provides a specific date range (knowledge be Draft oversight document cites Dershowitz as an eyewitness to abuse of a minor by Epstein. Identifies the victim as Jane Doe #3, later named Miss Roberts. Specifies knowledge timeframe up to Dec 30 2

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.