IG Report alleges anti‑Trump bias among senior FBI officials in Crossfire Hurricane and Clinton email probesList of Interviews with Scholars, Celebrities, and Officials on Literary and Scientific Topics
Case File
d-374House OversightLegal FilingThe memorandum argues that counts one through four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed...
The memorandum argues that counts one through four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred, asserting that the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 does not apply retroactively and that the statute does not cover the offenses charged in those counts.
Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-374
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The memorandum argues that counts one through four of the superseding indictment should be dismissed as time-barred, asserting that the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 does not apply retroactively and that the statute does not cover the offenses charged in those counts.
Tags
Statute of LimitationsRetroactivity of the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283Application of 18 U.S.C. § 3283 to the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.