Judge Seizes 22‑Minute Tape of George Rush Interview with Jeffrey Epstein Amid Ongoing Victim Lawsuits
The passage reveals a sealed 22‑minute recording of a conversation between journalist George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein that could contain direct statements from Epstein about his victims. It identifies Federal Judge Lawrence M. McKenna seized the tape but has not yet ruled on its release. Attorneys for victims (Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell) are seeking the tape to support civil suits. Reporter’s priv
Summary
The passage reveals a sealed 22‑minute recording of a conversation between journalist George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein that could contain direct statements from Epstein about his victims. It identifies Federal Judge Lawrence M. McKenna seized the tape but has not yet ruled on its release. Attorneys for victims (Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell) are seeking the tape to support civil suits. Reporter’s priv
Persons Referenced (4)
“...Beach against Epstein. A status check is set for Thursday in those cases before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Doe could have settled the lawsuit for $50,000 but is asking for $50 million in damages, Cassell s...”
Paul Cassell“...rding during the hearing. Fort Lauderdale attorney Brad Edwards and Utah attorney and law professor Paul Cassell are fighting to obtain the 22-minute tape on behalf of Epstein victim Jane Doe. She has filed one o...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...ape-recorded conversation between veteran newspaper reporter George Rush and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But U.S. District Judge Lawrence M. McKenna reserved ruling on whether the recording will be relea...”
Bradley Edwards“...as minors. McKenna didn't listen to the recording during the hearing. Fort Lauderdale attorney Brad Edwards and Utah attorney and law professor Paul Cassell are fighting to obtain the 22-minute tape on behal...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (2)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
palmbeachdailynews.comhttp://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_dociRelated Documents (6)
Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019
From: To: Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:27:22 +0000 Ha, really? In that case pretty sure I've seen the filing but will take a look. Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2019, at 7:24 PM, ) < > wrote: That article is a reference to a government filing from over a month ago (Spencer Kuvin seems especially interested in being quotes in belated but inflammatory fashion on these issues) — but in any event, the NDGA filing from then is attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 17:14 To: Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 It looks like NDGa just filed something in the CVRA litigation — do you have a copy by any chance? From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:12 PM Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Contents Public Corruption. 2 Epstein. 2 Collins. 18 Securities and Commodities Fraud. 20 Stewart 20 Thompson. 22 Pinto-Thomaz. 24 Narco
Federal prosecutors defend 2007 non‑prosecution deal with Jeffrey Epstein amid victim lawsuits
The passage provides concrete details about the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement, including dates, the Assistant U.S. Attorney (Marie Villafana), the judge (Kenneth Marra), and references to former Soli Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafana authored a sworn affidavit describing the DOJ’s decision‑mak The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges while avoiding federal
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 4
Lawyers Seek to Reopen Federal Case Against Jeffrey Epstein Over Secret Plea Deal
The passage details an active lawsuit alleging that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping a secret non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific off Lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does alleging a secre They argue federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of
EFTA00018441
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.