Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37511House OversightOther

Judge Seizes 22‑Minute Tape of George Rush Interview with Jeffrey Epstein Amid Ongoing Victim Lawsuits

The passage reveals a sealed 22‑minute recording of a conversation between journalist George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein that could contain direct statements from Epstein about his victims. It identifies Federal Judge Lawrence M. McKenna seized the tape but has not yet ruled on its release. Attorneys for victims (Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell) are seeking the tape to support civil suits. Reporter’s priv

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013411
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a sealed 22‑minute recording of a conversation between journalist George Rush and Jeffrey Epstein that could contain direct statements from Epstein about his victims. It identifies Federal Judge Lawrence M. McKenna seized the tape but has not yet ruled on its release. Attorneys for victims (Brad Edwards, Paul Cassell) are seeking the tape to support civil suits. Reporter’s priv

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincivil-financial-damagespotential-evidentiary-materialgeorge-rushreporter-privilege-disputevictim-testimonycivil-litigationreporter-privilegecourt-filingslegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_doci... Palm Beach Daily News: Archives PalmBeachDailyNews.com THE SHINY SHEET EEE EEE powered vYAHOoo! Search for Palm Beach Daily News ec | Follow @ShinySheet “= on Twitter! alm Beach Daily re en ELECTRONIC EDITION 4/7/11 1:35 PM Start or Renew Your Subscription Thine Electronic Edition Now Available! Click Here To Subscribe NEWS Religion | Archives E-mail this page ©Print this page 27 Most popular New Search Return to results Printer Friendly About your archives purchase: Your purchase of 20 articles expires on 04/07/2011 4:22 PM. You have viewed 3 articles and have 17 articles remaining. Palm Beach Daily News (FL) JUDGE RECEIVES EPSTEIN TAPE RULING PENDING MICHELE DARGAN, Daily News Staff Writer Published: May 5, 2010 NEW YORK -- A Manhattan federal judge Tuesday took into custody a tape-recorded conversation between veteran newspaper reporter George Rush and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But U.S. District Judge Lawrence M. McKenna reserved ruling on whether the recording will be released to attorneys representing young women who were sexually abused by Epstein as minors. McKenna didn't listen to the recording during the hearing. Fort Lauderdale attorney Brad Edwards and Utah attorney and law professor Paul Cassell are fighting to obtain the 22-minute tape on behalf of Epstein victim Jane Doe. She has filed one of a dozen pending civil cases in federal court in West Palm Beach against Epstein. A status check is set for Thursday in those cases before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Doe could have settled the lawsuit for $50,000 but is asking for $50 million in damages, Cassell said Tuesday. "Jane Doe was repeatedly sexually assaulted over a lengthy period of time by this wealthy and powerful man," Cassell said. Epstein, 57, is currently under house arrest in his Palm Beach home after serving 13 months of an 18- month state sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution and soliciting prostitution. Nearly two dozen young women have filed lawsuits against the billionaire money manager -- some already settled -- all alleging Epstein sexually abused them as minors at his El Brillo Way home. Cites reporter's protected privilege Rush, of the New York Daily News, was present in the courtroom, but did not have to testify Tuesday. Neither did Fort Lauderdale private investigator Michael Fisten, also in the courtroom. Working on behalf of Epstein victims, Fisten discovered the existence of the tape and had a conversation with Rush about its contents. Representing Rush and the newspaper, Washington attorney Laura Handman and New York Daily News attorney Anne Carroll argued the tape should not be released under any circumstances, citing reporter's protected privilege. Rush told Epstein the conversation was "off the record" and has never published any portion of that conversation. But even if portions had been printed, the unpublished portions would still be protected, Handman said. Handman cited cases where interviews were conducted in the presence of other people and privilege was not waived. In addition, Handman argued that Rush should not have to testify in court. The ability for reporter's privilege to be protected is crucial in culling sources and gathering information for news stories, Handman said. Reporting is all about give and take between the reporter and the source; that's what reporters have to do, Handman said. "This is so critical to news gathering," Handman said. "Mr. Rush could find himself testifying in [many] cases just because he had the temerity to do some reporting on a very important story.” There is nothing helpful to Doe's case on the tape and “Jane Doe is not referred to once in that tape,” Handman said. Cassell argued that the tape is "critical in showing Epstein's lack of remorse." Cassell described Epstein as a pitiless sexual abuser to Jane Doe and at least 30 other minor girls. Even though Jane Doe is not referred to by name on the tape, Epstein refers to his victims as “the girls" and makes disparaging remarks about them on the tape, Cassell said. Tape played for others Cassell said privilege does not apply because it was waived when Rush played the tape for three people and verbally divulged its contents to two others, including Fisten and Edwards, who also represents two other victims. But even if there is "qualified privilege," Cassell says, it is outweighed by Doe's inability to obtain the information anywhere else and the jury's need to hear Epstein's own words about his lack of remorse. Since Epstein has exercised his Fifth Amendment right during questioning by victims’ attorneys, the jury Classifieds Real Estate by Shannon Donnelly 4. 3°” ername=dkiesq&s_accountid=AC0111040620221012261&s_upgradeable=no Page 1 of 2

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainpalmbeachdailynews.com
URLhttp://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_doci

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019

From: To: Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:27:22 +0000 Ha, really? In that case pretty sure I've seen the filing but will take a look. Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2019, at 7:24 PM, ) < > wrote: That article is a reference to a government filing from over a month ago (Spencer Kuvin seems especially interested in being quotes in belated but inflammatory fashion on these issues) — but in any event, the NDGA filing from then is attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 17:14 To: Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 It looks like NDGa just filed something in the CVRA litigation — do you have a copy by any chance? From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:12 PM Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Contents Public Corruption. 2 Epstein. 2 Collins. 18 Securities and Commodities Fraud. 20 Stewart 20 Thompson. 22 Pinto-Thomaz. 24 Narco

25p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Federal prosecutors defend 2007 non‑prosecution deal with Jeffrey Epstein amid victim lawsuits

The passage provides concrete details about the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement, including dates, the Assistant U.S. Attorney (Marie Villafana), the judge (Kenneth Marra), and references to former Soli Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafana authored a sworn affidavit describing the DOJ’s decision‑mak The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges while avoiding federal

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 4

6p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Lawyers Seek to Reopen Federal Case Against Jeffrey Epstein Over Secret Plea Deal

The passage details an active lawsuit alleging that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping a secret non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific off Lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Jane Does alleging a secre They argue federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of

5p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00018441

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves

132p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.