Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37632House OversightOther

Historical analysis of post‑World War II great‑power competition in the Levant and early Israeli security dynamics

The passage offers a broad, retrospective narrative about U.S., Soviet, and regional actors in 1948. It contains no specific new allegations, transactions, dates, or individuals beyond well‑known hist Describes U.S. and Soviet interest in the creation of Israel as a geopolitical foothold in the Levan Claims Jordan secretly collaborated with Israel in 1948. Characterizes Egypt’s threat to Israel as

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031871
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage offers a broad, retrospective narrative about U.S., Soviet, and regional actors in 1948. It contains no specific new allegations, transactions, dates, or individuals beyond well‑known hist Describes U.S. and Soviet interest in the creation of Israel as a geopolitical foothold in the Levan Claims Jordan secretly collaborated with Israel in 1948. Characterizes Egypt’s threat to Israel as

Tags

cold-warisraelhistorical-analysismiddle-easthouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
38 emerged after World War II — the United States and the Soviet Union — were engaged in an intense struggle for the eastern Mediterranean after World War II, as can be seen in the Greek and Turkish issues at that time. Neither wanted to see the British Empire survive, each wanted the Levant, and neither was prepared to make a decisive move to take it. Both the United States and the Soviet Union saw the re-creation of Israel as an opportunity to introduce their power to the Levant. The Soviets thought they might have some influence over Israel due to ideology. The Americans thought they might have some influence given the role of American Jews in the founding. Neither was thinking particularly clearly about the matter, because neither had truly found its balance after World War II. Both knew the Levant was important, but neither saw the Levant as a central battleground at that moment. Israel slipped through the cracks. Once the question of Jewish unity was settled through ruthless action by David Ben Gurion's government, Israel faced a simultaneous threat from all of its immediate neighbors. However, as we have seen, the threat in 1948 was more apparent than real. The northern Levant, Lebanon, was fundamentally disunited — far more interested in regional maritime trade and concerned about control from Damascus. It posed no real threat to Israel. Jordan, settling the eastern bank of the Jordan River, was an outside power that had been transplanted into the region and was more concerned about native Arabs — the Palestinians — than about Israel. The Jordanians secretly collaborated with Israel. Egypt did pose a threat, but its ability to maintain lines of supply across the Sinai was severely limited and its genuine interest in engaging and destroying Israel was more rhetorical than real. As usual, the Egyptians could not afford the level of effort needed to move into the Levant. Syria by itself had a very real interest in Israel's defeat, but by itself was incapable of decisive

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.