Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37847House OversightOther

Analysis of US Labor Productivity Growth and Federal Spending Shifts

The document provides historical productivity data and federal spending trends but contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile individuals or agen Technology, infrastructure, and education accounted for ~90% of labor productivity growth (1977‑2000 Federal spending has increasingly shifted from productive investments to entitlement programs (197

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021025
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document provides historical productivity data and federal spending trends but contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, or actionable leads involving high‑profile individuals or agen Technology, infrastructure, and education accounted for ~90% of labor productivity growth (1977‑2000 Federal spending has increasingly shifted from productive investments to entitlement programs (197

Tags

infrastructurepolicy-analysislabor-productivitytechnology-investmentfederal-spendinghouse-oversighteducation

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Technology + Infrastructure + Education Investments Drove ~90% of Labor Productivity Growth for Past ~30 Years Sources of USA Average Labor Productivity Growth, 1977-2000 = Technology Investment i Infrastructure & Other Investment 1 Education (Labor Quality) 1 Other (Total Factor Productivity) Average Annual Growth Rate (%) 0.0% 1977-1990 1990-1995 1995-2000 Note: Total Factor Productivity is the portion of output not explained by the amount of inputs used in production. Source: Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, Kevin J. Stiroh, “Growth of U.S. Industries and Investments in Information KP Technology and Higher Education” <http:/;www.nber.org/chapters/c10627> (@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 367 However, USA Inc. Has Increasingly Allocated Resources Away from Productive Technology + Infrastructure + Education Investment / Spending Toward Less-Productive Entitlement Program Spending USA Real Federal Productive vs. Less-Productive Spending*, 1970-2009 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% % Share of Total Federal Spending 0% 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 Note: *Total spending exciudes one-time items (such as TARP / GSE / ARRA) for F2008 / F2009 data. Data source: White House Office of Management & Budget (1970-2009). www.kpcb.com ne. at Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? kpeb USA Inc. | What Might a T dE Consider? 368

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.kpcb.com
Domainwww.nber.org

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.