Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-38007House OversightOther

Justice Department Victim Rights Obligations Under VRRA and CVRA Discussed in House Oversight Document

The passage outlines statutory requirements for victim notification and assistance, referencing internal DOJ guidelines and OLC memoranda. It does not identify specific individuals, transactions, or m VRRA mandates DOJ to inform victims of federal crimes about services and investigation status before Attorney General Guidelines require rapid victim identification at the opening of a criminal inves

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017616
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage outlines statutory requirements for victim notification and assistance, referencing internal DOJ guidelines and OLC memoranda. It does not identify specific individuals, transactions, or m VRRA mandates DOJ to inform victims of federal crimes about services and investigation status before Attorney General Guidelines require rapid victim identification at the opening of a criminal inves

Tags

office-of-legal-counsellegal-interpretationvrrahouse-oversightlegal-memorandumvictim-rightspolicy-guidancecvradepartment-of-justice

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 13 of 31 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *77 the VRRA, the Justice Department must inform victims of federal crimes of services that are available to them, including "emergency medical and social services," counseling, and support. ?! The Department is further obligated to keep victims fully informed about "the status of the investigation of the crime, to the extent it is appropriate to inform the victim and to the extent that it will not interfere with the investigation." °* These rights to notice about "emergency medical and social services" *? as well as to the "status of the investigation of the crime" °* obviously require the Department to identify victims of federal crimes before formal charges have been filed. Indeed, the VRRA makes this point clear by directing the Department to not only notify the victim about the status of the investigation but also about the later "filing of charges against a suspected offender." °° The VRRA then extends victims’ rights to information through the rest of the criminal justice process by requiring the Department to provide notice to victims of such things as the imposed sentence and the defendant's release. ° The VRRA not only requires the Department to identify victims during the investigation of a crime, it also defines those victims in a very similar fashion to the CVRA. The VRRA defines "victim" as a "person that has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of a crime." °’ Thus, the Department is already routinely identifying persons who have been "harmed" by federal crimes shortly after the commission of those crimes and well before formal charging. The Attorney General has also promulgated internal guidelines requiring Justice Department components to identify victims rapidly after a crime. The Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance provide that "Department responsibilities to crime victims begin as soon as possible after the detection of a crime at which they may be undertaken [*78] without interfering in the investigation. Generally, this point in time is defined by the opening of a criminal investigation." °° Gtven the way the two statutes work, it would make no sense to artificially confine the CVRA's reach until after the filing of a criminal complaint. Before then, victims will have often recetved information from the Department about the status of the investigation. They might wish to confer with prosecutors about how the case is proceeding, and the CVRA extends to them a right to confer. °? Similarly, while the Department is notifying victims about the services they may receive and the status of an investigation, it is important that the victims be treated fairly. The CVRA extends the right to be treated fairly. '°° Indeed, it would be absurd to think that Congress wanted to permit the Justice Department to treat crime victims unfairly until criminal charges have been filed. Instead of recognizing Congress's intent, OLC's 2011 memorandum simply cites to a series of cases in which courts concluded that a victim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections. !°! Yet none of these cases - United States v. 10 104 Turner, !9? Searcy v. Paletz, !°3 or Searcy v. Skinner - provide strong support for OLC's position. Turner is a particularly 9 See 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(A). % Td. § 10607(c)(1)(A). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(A). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(C). % Td. § 10607(c)(3)(G). 97 Td. § 10607(€)(2). °8 Attorney General Guidelines, supra note 52, at 7 (internal citations omitted); see also 42 U.S.C. § 10607(b). 9 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5) (2012) (preserving "the reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case"). 100 Td. § 3771 (a)(8) (preserving "the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy”). 101 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6 n.6. 102 367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.