Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-38143House OversightOther

Lawyers seek unsealing of emails tied to alleged sexual misconduct claims involving presidential candidates, former president, and high‑profile ent...

The passage references alleged sexual misconduct by multiple presidential candidates, a former president, and a leading entrepreneur, linking them to a high‑profile legal dispute and potential court s Allegations of sexual misconduct involve two presidential candidates, a former president, and a majo Ms. EEE provided the allegations to a New York Post journalist, who declined to publish them. Lawy

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019299
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage references alleged sexual misconduct by multiple presidential candidates, a former president, and a leading entrepreneur, linking them to a high‑profile legal dispute and potential court s Allegations of sexual misconduct involve two presidential candidates, a former president, and a majo Ms. EEE provided the allegations to a New York Post journalist, who declined to publish them. Lawy

Tags

sealing-ordersmedia-suppressionpolitical-figurescourt-order-manipulationcourt-filingsmedia-disclosurelegal-exposurehouse-oversightmoderate-importancesexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP Page 3 they were raw.” Notably, in these emails, Ms. [J mentions Professor Dershowitz, but she does not allege that she was trafficked to or had sex with him. As you know, Ms. EEE provided this information, on the record, to a New York Post journalist with the expressed hope that it would be published. Although these allegations, if credible, would have been the story of a lifetime — videos and eye witness accounts of sexual misconduct by two presidential candidates, a former president, and one of the world’s leading entrepreneurs— the New York Post declined to publish them, presumably, and not surprisingly, because it did not find Ms. MM credible. Nonetheless, thereafter, Ms. | represented by the same lawyers who represent the plaintiff in the above-captioned case, was permitted to testify that Professor Dershowitz had sex with her. These same lawyers have now provided documents to the Washington Post repeating the false charges, but have failed to provide the Post with the emails that fatally undermine them. These selective disclosures, and this use of the court’s protective and sealing orders “as a sword,” are manifestly improper. Professor Dershowitz intends to pursue all available remedies for violations of the district court’s orders, including sanctions. That said, to remedy the gross imbalance in available information created by counsel’s improper disclosures, we ask that the parties’ counsel immediately agree to a stipulation, to be so-ordered by Judge Sweet, unsealing and removing the confidentiality designations from Ms. HEEB emails. This will allow for full public disclosure of these matters—where their falsity, exposed to the “sunlight” of public review, will be manifest—and it will permit Professor Dershowitz to respond fully to the accusations plaintift’s counsel leaked to the Washington Post. Only with such full disclosure can the public decide who is telling the truth. Please let us know your response to this request by noon on February 9, 2018. Very truly yours, Andrew G. Celli, Jr.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.