Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-4145Dept. of Justice

Alberto, [EFTA00007609]

Alberto, I received your short letter with great disappointment. Unfortunately, today, I cannot accept your "resignation". I'm sorry. but it is not that simple to abandon a "family member", no matter how frustrating or good-looking he may be. If my appreciation for both you and your talent has no...

Date
December 19, 2025
Source
Dept. of Justice
Reference
EFTA 00007609
Pages
3
Persons
0
Redactions
8
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Alberto, I received your short letter with great disappointment. Unfortunately, today, I cannot accept your "resignation". I'm sorry. but it is not that simple to abandon a "family member", no matter how frustrating or good-looking he may be. If my appreciation for both you and your talent has no...

This document is from the DOJ EFTA Releases (OCR).

View Source Collection

Tags

efta

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
EFTA00007609\n\nAlberto, \nI received your short letter with great disappointment. Unfortunately, today, I cannot \naccept your "resignation". I'm sorry. but it is not that simple to abandon a "family member", no \nmatter how frustrating or good-looking he may be. \nIf my appreciation for both you and your talent has not been adequately expressed as you \nand I have not spoken directly, I apologize. \nI am sure you have forgotten, but you had initially assured me that the island project \nwould be done for last Christmas. I have Sways been both gracious and generous in forgiving \nthe dates that have slipped by. You and I here. I theta a unique understanding. \nJean, who amend se the project would be complete,by the end of July, when in fact, for \nexample, till this dg dal ate still woodso picking asses far tide tables in the living room, has \nyet to contact me. Emus swig opposed to rive, but evenintil today, I have not been told \nwhat and %teethe:pat Ike Seth \nAlberto, it is your right to take on only jobs you want. It is both unfair, unfriendly and \nunprofessint to simply leave a job undone in the middle. This is not your way. I don't believe \nthat you would treat a less friendly client with the same disregard. \nI would hope that you will reconsider the big house Island project. As you know, we \nhave bought many things for the interior and have incurred great expense to get permits and \ndrawings in a Moroccan style, but if you choose not to move forward, I think at a minimum, my \nhouse should not be left in the state of disrepair in which it currently sits and should be brought \nto completion as soon as possible. If Jean, who I have great respect for, does not want to \ncomplete it as I believe he is only an employee and as I have my total relationship not with Jean, \nbut with Cabinet Pinto, the obligation falls on you personally. This is only right, you know it is. \nAs you are aware, I was told repeatedly that you would call me upon return from your vacation \nand both visit and finish the project. You and I have more of a friendship than my receiving, in a \nEFTA00007610\n\nfrankly impolite way, only a letter and not even the phone call I was repeatedly promised. \n(However, I Sow you don't like tension) Please call me at your earliest convenience. \nI tail your friend \nEFTA00007611\n\n--- Page Break ---\n\nEFTA00007609\n\nAlberto, \nI received your short letter with great disappointment. Unfortunately, today, I cannot \naccept your "resignation". I'm sorry. but it is not that simple to abandon a "family member", no \nmatter how frustrating or good-looking he may be. \nIf my appreciation for both you and your talent has not been adequately expressed as you \nand I have not spoken directly, I apologize. \nI am sure you have forgotten, but you had initially assured me that the island project \nwould be done for last Christmas. I have Sways been both gracious and generous in forgiving \nthe dates that have slipped by. You and I here. I theta a unique understanding. \nJean, who amend se the project would be complete,by the end of July, when in fact, for \nexample, till this dg dal ate still woodso picking asses far tide tables in the living room, has \nyet to contact me. Emus swig opposed to rive, but evenintil today, I have not been told \nwhat and %teethe:pat Ike Seth \nAlberto, it is your right to take on only jobs you want. It is both unfair, unfriendly and \nunprofessint to simply leave a job undone in the middle. This is not your way. I don't believe \nthat you would treat a less friendly client with the same disregard. \nI would hope that you will reconsider the big house Island project. As you know, we \nhave bought many things for the interior and have incurred great expense to get permits and \ndrawings in a Moroccan style, but if you choose not to move forward, I think at a minimum, my \nhouse should not be left in the state of disrepair in which it currently sits and should be brought \nto completion as soon as possible. If Jean, who I have great respect for, does not want to \ncomplete it as I believe he is only an employee and as I have my total relationship not with Jean, \nbut with Cabinet Pinto, the obligation falls on you personally. This is only right, you know it is. \nAs you are aware, I was told repeatedly that you would call me upon return from your vacation \nand both visit and finish the project. You and I have more of a friendship than my receiving, in a \nEFTA00007610\n\nfrankly impolite way, only a letter and not even the phone call I was repeatedly promised. \n(However, I Sow you don't like tension) Please call me at your earliest convenience. \nI tail your friend \nEFTA00007611\n\n--- Page Break ---\n\nEFTA00007609\n\nAlberto, \nI received your short letter with great disappointment. Unfortunately, today, I cannot \naccept your "resignation". I'm sorry. but it is not that simple to abandon a "family member", no \nmatter how frustrating or good-looking he may be. \nIf my appreciation for both you and your talent has not been adequately expressed as you \nand I have not spoken directly, I apologize. \nI am sure you have forgotten, but you had initially assured me that the island project \nwould be done for last Christmas. I have Sways been both gracious and generous in forgiving \nthe dates that have slipped by. You and I here. I theta a unique understanding. \nJean, who amend se the project would be complete,by the end of July, when in fact, for \nexample, till this dg dal ate still woodso picking asses far tide tables in the living room, has \nyet to contact me. Emus swig opposed to rive, but evenintil today, I have not been told \nwhat and %teethe:pat Ike Seth \nAlberto, it is your right to take on only jobs you want. It is both unfair, unfriendly and \nunprofessint to simply leave a job undone in the middle. This is not your way. I don't believe \nthat you would treat a less friendly client with the same disregard. \nI would hope that you will reconsider the big house Island project. As you know, we \nhave bought many things for the interior and have incurred great expense to get permits and \ndrawings in a Moroccan style, but if you choose not to move forward, I think at a minimum, my \nhouse should not be left in the state of disrepair in which it currently sits and should be brought \nto completion as soon as possible. If Jean, who I have great respect for, does not want to \ncomplete it as I believe he is only an employee and as I have my total relationship not with Jean, \nbut with Cabinet Pinto, the obligation falls on you personally. This is only right, you know it is. \nAs you are aware, I was told repeatedly that you would call me upon return from your vacation \nand both visit and finish the project. You and I have more of a friendship than my receiving, in a \nEFTA00007610\n\nfrankly impolite way, only a letter and not even the phone call I was repeatedly promised. \n(However, I Sow you don't like tension) Please call me at your earliest convenience. \nI tail your friend \nEFTA00007611

Redaction Analysis

Lightly Redacted

Analysis of government redactions applied to this document before public release. Some redacted content was recoverable from improperly applied redactions.

8
Total Redactions
7
Proper
1
Improper
Yes
Recoverable Text
Redaction Density16%

Source: Redaction analysis by rhowardstone/Epstein-research-data

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.