Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-536House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a court filing that discusses the legal framework for a motion to reconsider, citing...

The document is a court filing that discusses the legal framework for a motion to reconsider, citing relevant case law and explaining the district court's discretionary authority to review and revise interlocutory orders. It argues that new evidence justifies reconsideration of a previous decision. The filing appears to be part of a larger case, referenced as 'Cased 1:17-cr-02949-MVIT'.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-536
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a court filing that discusses the legal framework for a motion to reconsider, citing relevant case law and explaining the district court's discretionary authority to review and revise interlocutory orders. It argues that new evidence justifies reconsideration of a previous decision. The filing appears to be part of a larger case, referenced as 'Cased 1:17-cr-02949-MVIT'.

Tags

Motion to ReconsiderDistrict Court's Discretionary AuthorityNew Evidence

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.