Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-581House OversightLegal Filing

The document contains a statement made by the defense, arguing that the defendant's actions were mis...

The document contains a statement made by the defense, arguing that the defendant's actions were mistakes made in the chaos of a law firm, and that the government has not provided sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's intent (mens rea). The defense challenges the 'must have known' argument made by the government, citing the defendant's limited accounting experience.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-581
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document contains a statement made by the defense, arguing that the defendant's actions were mistakes made in the chaos of a law firm, and that the government has not provided sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's intent (mens rea). The defense challenges the 'must have known' argument made by the government, citing the defendant's limited accounting experience.

Tags

tax returnsbackdating transactionsmens rea

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.