Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6431Court UnsealedCorrespondence

Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Suppress Evidence: 140

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government's subpoena to a third party was unconstitutional and violated her rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as the Martindell principle. They seek to suppress evidence obtained from this subpoena and dismiss certain counts.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 140
Pages
21
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the government's subpoena to a third party was unconstitutional and violated her rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, as well as the Martindell principle. They seek to suppress evidence obtained from this subpoena and dismiss certain counts.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.