Court Filing - Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike Surplusage: 146
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to strike surplusage from the superseding indictment, arguing that allegations regarding Accuser-3 are irrelevant, prejudicial, and should be stricken or subject to the admissibility requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). The memorandum contests the government's inclusion of Accuser-3's allegations, claiming they do not support the charges against Maxwell.
Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to strike surplusage from the superseding indictment, arguing that allegations regarding Accuser-3 are irrelevant, prejudicial, and should be stricken or subject to the admissibility requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). The memorandum contests the government's inclusion of Accuser-3's allegations, claiming they do not support the charges against Maxwell.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (6)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter from Prosecutor to Defense Counsel: 442-1
The US Attorney's Office notifies defense counsel that they intend to introduce evidence at trial showing Ghislaine Maxwell's actions to please influential men by providing them with access to women she selected. The evidence includes exhibits and testimony from a witness who worked for Jeffrey Epstein, which the prosecution argues is admissible as direct evidence or under Rule 404(b).
EFTA00011259
EFTA00020978
EFTA00030861
EFTA00030934
EFTA00023026
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.