Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6476Court UnsealedDeposition

deposition transcript: 1616630

The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 1616630
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5825

The deponent, a lawyer, testifies about representing Craig Brubaker and discusses a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, regarding jury instructions. The deponent also recounts a conversation with opposing counsel Susan Brune about Conrad.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5816

The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer at Kramer Levin, who represented Raymond Craig Brubaker in the trial of David Parse. Schoeman discusses his involvement in the trial and the role of his partner Barry Berke. He is questioned about a note from Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, read aloud by the Court on May 11, 2011.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1

This document is an exhibit list from a court filing in Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE, referencing various documents from the Conrad v. Manessis case, including trial testimony, verdict, and post-trial motions. The exhibits include affirmations, affidavits, and other records related to the case. The list provides a catalog of documents submitted as evidence or used in the proceedings.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5793

The deponent discusses receiving a letter from Catherine Conrad and their subsequent conversation with Susan Brune about it. The letter revealed information about jury deliberations, disturbing the deponent. The deponent discussed the Appellate Division order with Susan Brune but not the Westlaw report.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Exhibit List: 2020-08-000086-BE-N

This document is a list of exhibits filed in a court case, including orders, affirmations, judgments, testimony excerpts, and affidavits related to Conrad v. Manessis. The exhibits cover trial proceedings, post-trial motions, and evidence. The list appears to be part of a larger court filing.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: 6168/20

The transcript captures a court hearing where the prosecutor, Ms. Davis, argues that the defense made a strategic decision not to disclose information about a juror, and that this decision cannot form the basis of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The government also presents evidence of the defendant's involvement in the alleged crimes, highlighting his role in orchestrating complex transactions.

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.