Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-658House OversightDeposition

The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge...

The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct, and the editing process. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-658
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct, and the editing process. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.

Tags

Discussion about a brief and its contentLevel of knowledge regarding juror misconductDrafting and editing the brief
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.