Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6605Court UnsealedLegal Filing

Court Filing: 1:17-cr-02949-MVIT Document 3061 Filed 03/06/24 Page 5 of 16

The document is a court filing that discusses the legal framework for a motion to reconsider, citing relevant case law and explaining the district court's discretionary authority to review and revise interlocutory orders. It argues that new evidence justifies reconsideration of a previous decision. The filing appears to be part of a larger case, referenced as 'Cased 1:17-cr-02949-MVIT'.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 1:17-cr-02949-mvit document 3061 filed 03/06/24 page 5 of 16
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a court filing that discusses the legal framework for a motion to reconsider, citing relevant case law and explaining the district court's discretionary authority to review and revise interlocutory orders. It argues that new evidence justifies reconsideration of a previous decision. The filing appears to be part of a larger case, referenced as 'Cased 1:17-cr-02949-MVIT'.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: 1:17-cr-02949-mvit document 3061 filed 03/06/24 page 5 of 16
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.