Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-661House OversightDeposition

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-661
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Voir dire processJuror research and investigationIdentification of potential juror Catherine M. Conrad
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.