Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-661House Oversight

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...

Deposition

The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-661
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,800+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.