Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6650Court Unsealed

court filing or transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 78 of 117

Testimony

The document contains a statement made by the defense, arguing that the defendant's actions were mistakes made in the chaos of a law firm, and that the government has not provided sufficient evidence to prove the defendant's intent (mens rea). The defense challenges the 'must have known' argument made by the government, citing the defendant's limited accounting experience.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 1:20-cr-00338-pae document 1616-2 filed 02/24/22 page 78 of 117
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,800+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.