Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-666House OversightDeposition

The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, disc...

The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-666
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.

Tags

Conversation between the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma about Juror No. 1Investigation into Juror No. 1's identity and backgroundVoir dire process and its relevance to Juror No. 1's identity
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.