deposition: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE
Ms. Brune testifies about a brief she wrote, admitting it missed an important issue and did not accurately represent the timeline of an investigation. She also acknowledges that her colleague, Ms. Trzaskoma, was aware of the investigation but it was not accurately reflected in the brief.
Summary
Ms. Brune testifies about a brief she wrote, admitting it missed an important issue and did not accurately represent the timeline of an investigation. She also acknowledges that her colleague, Ms. Trzaskoma, was aware of the investigation but it was not accurately reflected in the brief.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
deposition: A-5750
Ms. Brune is questioned about a brief she wrote, which omitted key facts, including a suspension opinion found by Ms. Trzaskoma. Ms. Brune acknowledges the omission and defends the brief's accuracy regarding the investigation's timing.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
Ms. Edelstein is cross-examined about a conversation with colleagues regarding a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1. She explains that they didn't bring it to the court's attention because they deemed it inconceivable that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer. There was no discussion about raising a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion until after receiving a letter from Ms. Conrad.
deposition transcript: A-5810
The transcript captures the cross-examination of Ms. Edelstein by Mr. Schectman, focusing on a conversation about a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1 and the decision not to raise a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion.
P007796-031024-001-463
P007796-031024-000001 P007796-031024-000002 P007796-031024-000003 P007796-031024-000004 P007796-031024-000005 Serial Number Date Obs Time Citation Operator Last Name Operator Agency Code BrAC 1 IR BrAC 1 EC ES IR ES EC BrAC 2 IR BrAC2 EC Sts ARKC-0062 9/24/2018 20:07:00 1826701771 FETTER, ARTHUR R 0270400 0.268 0.274 0.085 0.089 0.273 0.273 0 ARKC-0062 10/16/2018 00:46:00 1828900025 FETTER, ARTHUR R 0270400 0.117 0.12 0.086 0.089 0.118 0.119 0 ARKC-0060 10/18/2018 17:38:00 1829101593
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 613 of 130
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about her knowledge of Ms. Trzaskoma's potential attorney suspension and the actions taken by her team during the eight-day jury deliberation period.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03363-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.