Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-03038-PAE
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., dated February 15, 2012. It includes testimony from witnesses Conrad and Trzaskoma. The case was heard in the Southern District of New York.
Summary
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., dated February 15, 2012. It includes testimony from witnesses Conrad and Trzaskoma. The case was heard in the Southern District of New York.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript or deposition: 120ec1-006308-PA
The document appears to be a transcript of the direct testimony of Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on February 15, 2012. The testimony is part of a larger court proceeding. The specific details of Conrad's testimony are not clear from the provided snippet.
Deposition transcript: A-5644
The document is a transcript of Ms. Conrad's deposition testimony, where she is questioned about her financial situation, her previous statements to the court, and her interactions with Judge Pauley during voir dire. The testimony reveals potential inconsistencies in her statements and highlights her financial situation and relationship with her husband, a convicted felon.
Court Transcript: A-5653
This document contains pages 173-176 of the direct examination transcript of witness Conrad in the case USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas et al., filed in the Southern District of New York.
deposition transcript: A-5664
The document is a transcript of the cross-examination of Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on February 15, 2012. It appears to be related to a case involving tax shelters and potentially fraudulent tax strategies. The testimony may provide insight into the case against the defendants.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
Ms. Edelstein is cross-examined about a conversation with colleagues regarding a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1. She explains that they didn't bring it to the court's attention because they deemed it inconceivable that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer. There was no discussion about raising a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion until after receiving a letter from Ms. Conrad.
court transcript or deposition excerpt: A-5651
This document appears to be an excerpt from a court transcript or deposition in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, containing the direct testimony of a witness named Conrad. The testimony spans pages 165 to 168. The case is being heard in the Southern District of New York.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.