court transcript: 20-00886
The court transcript shows a discussion between the judge and attorneys about the jury selection process, a witness's name pronunciation, and COVID-19 protocols, including mask-wearing.
Summary
The court transcript shows a discussion between the judge and attorneys about the jury selection process, a witness's name pronunciation, and COVID-19 protocols, including mask-wearing.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Palm-Beach
November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder
court transcript: 2020R008308
The document is a court transcript where the defense attorney objects to Mr. Vega's testimony about the victim's injuries, arguing it's prejudicial and irrelevant. The prosecutor counters that the testimony is relevant to proving the cause of death and the victim's subsequent complications. The judge is considering the objection.
Court Transcript: 6988
The transcript details a pre-trial hearing where the judge discusses jury selection procedures, COVID-19 protocols, and introduces court personnel to the potential jurors. The court confirms that all parties have received the voir dire questionnaire and discusses the process for exercising peremptory strikes. The transcript also touches on the introduction of counsel and staff to the jury panel.
Court Transcript: 2020r000308
The document is a court transcript discussing the testimony of Mr. Vega about the victim's physical condition and its relevance to establishing causation. The prosecution argues that Mr. Vega's observations are crucial in connecting the victim's injuries to their death, while the defense expresses concerns about the graphic nature of the testimony.
17 August 16 through August 31 2016_Redacted.pdf
Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Juan Mendez Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:10 AM Brenda A. McKinley; C. Kay Woodring; Caitlyn D. Neff; Danielle Minarchick; Eric A. Lockridge; Jeffrey T. Hite; Jonathan M. Millinder; Julie A. Simoni; Kevin T. Jeirles; Larry L. Lidgett; Lee R. Sheaffer; Lorinda L. Brown; Matthew T. Fisher; Melanie L. Gordon; Michael S. Woods; Richard C. Smith; Stephanie D. McGhee; Thomas S. Allen, Jr.; Walter E. Jeirles Calendar and Status Report 8/16/2016 20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILER DOC //: DATE FILED: 11 /19/21 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is the Defendant's fourth motion in limine to "exclude evidence related to Accuser-3," to whom the Court refers as Witness-3, on the grounds that the testimony is not direct evidence of the charged conspiracies and is inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403. Dkt. Nos. 387, 444. The Court has twice heard argument related to this motion, including argument at the November 10, 2021 in camera hearing that was sealed pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. See generally Nov. 1, 2021 Transcript; Nov. 10, 2021 Transcript. At the November I, 2021 hearing, the Court provided a brief explanation of its current position based on the information then before it, but the Court ul
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.