court filing: 20-2000X08BAJND Document 838-3
The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.
Summary
The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionForum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.