Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6918Court UnsealedLegal Filing

court filing: 20-cr-608 (JGK)

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 20-cr-608 (jgk)
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: 20-cr-608 (jgk)
0Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 2017-03-30-Docme-010802-Filed-032730-Page-14-of-22

The court is reconsidering the defendant's bail request in light of new evidence, including letters from friends and family, particularly a letter from the defendant's spouse, which was not disclosed at the initial bail hearing. The court evaluates whether these new ties to the United States sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The court remains unconvinced that the defendant's ties would prevent her from fleeing.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court is reconsidering the defendant's bail request in light of new evidence, including letters ...

The court is reconsidering the defendant's bail request in light of new evidence, including letters from friends and family, particularly a letter from the defendant's spouse, which was not disclosed at the initial bail hearing. The court evaluates whether these new ties to the United States sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The court remains unconvinced that the defendant's ties would prevent her from fleeing.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00089154 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the "Renewed Bail Motion"). Five months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combina

34p
Court UnsealedAug 18, 2018

Sentencing Memorandum

Sentencing Memorandum , USA v. PAPADOPOULOS, No. 1:17-cr-00182-1 (D.D.C. Aug 17, 2018)

10p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail pac...

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant nueStates Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00103380 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE 1 BACKGROUND 2 APPLICABLE LAW 6 DISCUSSION 8 A. The Nature and Circumstances of the Offense 8 B. The Strength of the Evidence 9 C. The Characteristics of the Defendant 12 D. Conditions of Confinement 29 CONCLUSION 33 EFTA00103381 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Jackson v. Goon!, 664 F. Supp. 2d 307 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 27 United States v. Abdullahu, 488 F. Supp. 2d 433 (D.N.J. 2007) 19 United States v. Banki, 10 Cr. 008 (JFK), Dkt. 7 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2010),

36p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.