Deposition transcript: 204-11
The document is a transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition in a case brought by [REDACTED - Survivor]. Maxwell is questioned about her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities and her knowledge of his interactions with underage females. The deposition includes objections from Maxwell's counsel and redactions, indicating sensitive or potentially incriminating information.
Summary
The document is a transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition in a case brought by [REDACTED - Survivor]. Maxwell is questioned about her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities and her knowledge of his interactions with underage females. The deposition includes objections from Maxwell's counsel and redactions, indicating sensitive or potentially incriminating information.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
“...'s deposition in a case brought by Virginia Giuffre. Maxwell is questioned about her involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities and her knowledge of his interactions with underage females. The deposition inc...”
Related Documents (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, MARTINDELL, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Mennin • er Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00097649 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES iii TABLE OF EXHIBITS Factual Background 1 Argument 1 I. The Government's violation of the Fourth Amendment requires suppression 1 A. Maxwell has standing. 1 B. There is no good faith. 5 C. The government's inevitable discovery doctrine fails. 5 II. The Government's violation of Manindell requires suppression. 7 III. The
EFTA00038962
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22
EFTA00011452
Unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court papers
January 3, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c
Confidential
Confidential Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS **CONFIDENTIAL** x Continued Videotaped Deposition of GHISLAINE MAXWELL, the Defendant herein, taken pursuant to subpoena, was held at the law offices of Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, 575 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 (866) 624-6221 MAG NA 0 LEGAL SERVICES EFTA00083933 Confidential Page 2 1 2 APPEARANCES: 3 On Behalf of the Plaintiff: 4 BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER, LLP 333 Main Street 5 Armonk, New York 10504 BY: DAVID BOIES, ESQUIRE 6 7 8 BY: BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER,LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 MEREDITH SCHULTZ, ESQUIRE SIGRID McCAWLEY, ESQUIRE 9 SANDRA PER
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.